Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery
- PMID: 29130845
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711818
Restrictive or Liberal Red-Cell Transfusion for Cardiac Surgery
Abstract
Background: The effect of a restrictive versus liberal red-cell transfusion strategy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains unclear.
Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery who had a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) I of 6 or more (on a scale from 0 to 47, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of death after cardiac surgery) to a restrictive red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <7.5 g per deciliter, starting from induction of anesthesia) or a liberal red-cell transfusion threshold (transfuse if hemoglobin level was <9.5 g per deciliter in the operating room or intensive care unit [ICU] or was <8.5 g per deciliter in the non-ICU ward). The primary composite outcome was death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or by day 28, whichever came first. Secondary outcomes included red-cell transfusion and other clinical outcomes.
Results: The primary outcome occurred in 11.4% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 12.5% of those in the liberal-threshold group (absolute risk difference, -1.11 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.93 to 0.72; odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Mortality was 3.0% in the restrictive-threshold group and 3.6% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.16). Red-cell transfusion occurred in 52.3% of the patients in the restrictive-threshold group, as compared with 72.6% of those in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.47). There were no significant between-group differences with regard to the other secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: In patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, a restrictive strategy regarding red-cell transfusion was noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis, with less blood transfused. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; TRICS III ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02042898 .).
Comment in
-
Adverse Effects of Red-Cell Transfusion.N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1714159. N Engl J Med. 2018. PMID: 29298142 No abstract available.
-
Mortality after red blood cell transfusions from previously pregnant donors: complexities in the interpretation of large data.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Feb;10(2):648-652. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.77. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 29608196 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Teaching an old dog new TRICS: re-evaluating transfusion triggers in high-risk cardiac surgery.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Feb;10(2):674-677. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.78. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 29608203 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Thresholds, triggers or requirements-time to look beyond the transfusion trials.J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1152-1157. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.15. J Thorac Dis. 2018. PMID: 29708142 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical