Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):373.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1561-8.

Effect of frenotomy on breastfeeding variables in infants with ankyloglossia (tongue-tie): a prospective before and after cohort study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effect of frenotomy on breastfeeding variables in infants with ankyloglossia (tongue-tie): a prospective before and after cohort study

Kathryn Muldoon et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Controversy exists regarding ankyloglossia (tongue-tie) and its clinical impact on breastfeeding, including the benefits, or otherwise, of tongue-tie release (frenotomy). As exclusive breastfeeding rates in Ireland are already considerably low (46% on discharge home from the maternity unit following birth in 2014), it is imperative to protect and support breastfeeding, including identifying the associated effects that frenotomy might have on breastfeeding variables.

Objective: To determine the associated effects of frenotomy on breastfeeding variables in infants with ankyloglossia.

Methods: A prospective before and after cohort study was conducted. Following ethical approval, two self-reported questionnaires were administered to women whose infants were undergoing frenotomy at seven healthcare clinics in the Republic of Ireland. Data on breastfeeding variables prior to the frenotomy procedure and at 1-month post-frenotomy were collected and compared. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and proportions) were used to analyse, separately, the pre- and post-frenotomy data. Inferential statistics (z-test scores for differences between proportions (alpha <0.05) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)) were used for pre- and post-frenotomy comparative analyses.

Results: Ninety-eight women returned the baseline questionnaire, and, of these, 89 returned the follow-up questionnaire. The most common reason for seeking a frenotomy was difficulty with latch (38%). Private lactation consultants were the main person recommending a frenotomy (31%). Rates of exclusive breastfeeding remained similar pre- and post-frenotomy (58% versus 58%), although rates of formula feeding increased two-fold at follow-up. Infants' ability to extend their tongues to the lower lip after frenotomy was significantly increased (p < 0.0001). Almost all participants (91%) reported an overall improvement in breastfeeding post-frenotomy. Pain on breastfeeding was significantly reduced post-frenotomy (MD 2.90, 95% CI 3.75 to 2.05) and overall LATCH scale scores were significantly increased (MD -0.50, 95% CI -0.67 to -0.33).

Conclusions: This study supports the hypothesis that frenotomy has a positive effect on breastfeeding variables in infants with ankyloglossia. These findings, however, are based on a relatively small number of participants from one country only where breastfeeding rates are low. Further, larger studies are required to substantiate these findings.

Keywords: Ankyloglossia; Breastfeeding; Frenotomy; Tongue-tie.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval to conduct the study was granted by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin. Written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all of the study participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Main person recommending a frenotomy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Ability to extend tongue
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concerns pre- and post-frenotomy
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sources of help for breastfeeding

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rowan-Legg A. Ankyloglossia and breastfeeding: position statement. Can Paediatr Soc Community Paediatr Committee. 2015;20(4):209–213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geddes D, Langton D, Gollow I, Jacobs L, Hartmann P, Simmer K. Frenulotomy for breastfeeding infants with ankyloglossia: effect on milk removal and sucking mechanism as imaged by ultrasound. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e188–e194. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2553. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Segal LM, Stephenson R, Dawes M, Feldman P. Prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of ankyloglossia: Methodologic review. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53:1027–1033. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai PM, Vaz AC. Ankyloglossia among children of regular and special schools in karnataka, India: a prevalence study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(6):36–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. González JD, Costa RM, Riaño GI, González MMT, Rodríguez PMC, Lobete PC. Prevalence of ankyloglossia in newborns in Asturias (Spain) An Pediatr (Barc) 2014;81(2):115–119. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2013.10.030. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types