Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e017775.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017775.

Characteristics and healthcare utilisation patterns of high-cost beneficiaries in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional claims database study

Affiliations

Characteristics and healthcare utilisation patterns of high-cost beneficiaries in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional claims database study

Joost Johan Godert Wammes et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine medical needs, demographic characteristics and healthcare utilisation patterns of the top 1% and top 2%-5% high-cost beneficiaries in the Netherlands.

Design: Cross-sectional study using 1 year claims data. We broke down high-cost beneficiaries by demographics, the most cost-incurring condition per beneficiary and expensive treatment use.

Setting: Dutch curative health system, a health system with universal coverage.

Participants: 4.5 million beneficiaries of one health insurer.

Measures: Annual total costs through hospital, intensive care unit use, expensive drugs, other pharmaceuticals, mental care and others; demographics; most cost-incurring and secondary conditions; inpatient stay; number of morbidities; costs per ICD10-chapter (International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th revision); and expensive treatment use (including dialysis, transplant surgery, expensive drugs, intensive care unit and diagnosis-related groups >€30 000).

Results: The top 1% and top 2%-5% beneficiaries accounted for 23% and 26% of total expenditures, respectively. Among top 1% beneficiaries, hospital care represented 76% of spending, of which, respectively, 9.0% and 9.1% were spent on expensive drugs and ICU care. We found that 54% of top 1% beneficiaries were aged 65 years or younger and that average costs sharply decreased with higher age within the top 1% group. Expensive treatments contributed to high costs in one-third of top 1% beneficiaries and in less than 10% of top 2%-5% beneficiaries. The average number of conditions was 5.5 and 4.0 for top 1% and top 2%-5% beneficiaries, respectively. 53% of top 1% beneficiaries were treated for circulatory disorders but for only 22% of top 1% beneficiaries this was their most cost-incurring condition.

Conclusions: Expensive treatments, most cost-incurring condition and age proved to be informative variables for studying this heterogeneous population. Expensive treatments play a substantial role in high-costs beneficiaries. Interventions need to be aimed at beneficiaries of all ages; a sole focus on the elderly would leave many high-cost beneficiaries unaddressed. Tailored interventions are needed to meet the needs of high-cost beneficiaries and to avoid waste of scarce resources.

Keywords: health policy; high-cost patients; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cost drivers per age group in top 1% beneficiaries.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blumenthal D, Abrams MK. Tailoring Complex Care Management for High-Need, High-Cost Patients. JAMA 2016;316:1657 10.1001/jama.2016.12388 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wennberg JE, Bronner K, Skinner JS, et al. . Inpatient care intensity and patients' ratings of their hospital experiences. Health Aff 2009;28:103–12. 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.103 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Fernandez A. High and rising health care costs. Part 4: can costs be controlled while preserving quality? Ann Intern Med 2005;143:26–31. 10.7326/0003-4819-143-1-200507050-00007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Colla CH, Lewis VA, Kao LS, et al. . Association between medicare accountable care organization implementation and spending among clinically vulnerable beneficiaries. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:1167–75. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2827 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aldridge MD, Kelley AS. The Myth Regarding the High Cost of End-of-Life Care. Am J Public Health 2015;105:2411–5. 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302889 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms