Improving best practise for patients receiving hospital discharge letters: a realist review protocol
- PMID: 29133330
- PMCID: PMC5695342
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018353
Improving best practise for patients receiving hospital discharge letters: a realist review protocol
Abstract
Introduction: Discharge documents are important for transferring information from hospitals to the referring clinician; in the UK and many countries, this is often the patient's general practitioner or family physician. However, patients may or may not receive their discharge letters, and whether patients should routinely receive discharge letters remains unclear.
Methods and analysis: The review will consolidate evidence on patients receiving discharge letters through the theory-driven approach of a realist review.The review will be conducted systematically and seek to explain how, why, for whom and in what contexts does this practice 'work'. The review will specifically explore whether there are benefits of this practice and if so what are the important contexts for triggering the mechanisms associated with these outcome benefits. Negative effects will also be considered.Several steps will occur: devising initial rough programme theory, searching the evidence, selecting relevant documents, extracting data, synthesising and finally programme theory refinement. As the process is viewed as iterative, this cycle of steps may be repeated as many times as is necessary to reach theoretical saturation and may not be linear.The initial programme theory will be tested and refined throughout the review process and by stakeholder involvement of National Health Service (NHS) policy makers, practitioners and service users.
Ethics and dissemination: Formal ethical review is not required. The resulting programme theory is anticipated to explain how the intervention of patients receiving written discharge communication may work in practice, for whom and in what contexts; this will inform best practice of patients receiving discharge communication. The review findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations and discussions with relevant organisations and stakeholders. While the review will be from the perspective of the UK NHS, its findings should be relevant to other healthcare systems.
Prospero registration number: CRD42017069863.
Keywords: communication; discharge letter; hospital discharge; patient information; realist review.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Discharge communication study: a realist evaluation of discharge communication experiences of patients, general practitioners and hospital practitioners, alongside a corresponding discharge letter sample.BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 21;11(7):e045465. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045465. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34290064 Free PMC article.
-
Improving best practice for patients receiving hospital discharge letters: a realist review.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 9;9(6):e027588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027588. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31182447 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integrating Palliative Care and Heart Failure: the PalliatHeartSynthesis realist synthesis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(34):1-128. doi: 10.3310/FTRG5628. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39324696 Review.
-
Understanding the use of the National Early Warning Score 2 in acute care settings: a realist review protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 8;12(7):e062154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062154. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35803636 Free PMC article.
-
The Discharge Communication Study: research protocol for a mixed methods study to investigate and triangulate discharge communication experiences of patients, GPs, and hospital professionals, alongside a corresponding discharge letter sample.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4612-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31711500 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A Realist Review Protocol into the Contexts and Mechanisms That Enable the Inclusion of Environmental Sustainability Outcomes in the Design of Lean Healthcare Improvement Interventions.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 2;21(7):868. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070868. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39063445 Free PMC article.
-
Realist Evaluation of Autism ServiCe Delivery (RE-ASCeD): which diagnostic pathways work best, for whom and in what context? Protocol for a rapid realist review.BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 6;10(7):e037846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037846. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32636288 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-professional perceptions of clinical research delivery and the Clinical Research Nurse role: a realist review.J Res Nurs. 2022 Mar;27(1-2):9-29. doi: 10.1177/17449871211068017. Epub 2022 Apr 1. J Res Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35392190 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding how and under what circumstances decision coaching works for people making healthcare decisions: a realist review.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 8;22(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02007-0. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022. PMID: 36209086 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding the impact of delegated home visiting services accessed via general practice by community-dwelling patients: a realist review protocol.BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 13;8(11):e024876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024876. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30429150 Free PMC article.
References
-
- NHS England. Standards for the communication of patient diagnostic test results on discharge from hospital. 2016. http://www.england.nhs.uk/patientsafety/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2016... (accessed Jan 2017).
-
- Department of Health. Copying letters to patients: good practice guidelines, 2003. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ (accessed 9 May 2017).
-
- Department of Health. The NHS plan. 2000. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk (accessed 2 Jun 2017).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials