Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e018353.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018353.

Improving best practise for patients receiving hospital discharge letters: a realist review protocol

Affiliations

Improving best practise for patients receiving hospital discharge letters: a realist review protocol

Katharine Weetman et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Discharge documents are important for transferring information from hospitals to the referring clinician; in the UK and many countries, this is often the patient's general practitioner or family physician. However, patients may or may not receive their discharge letters, and whether patients should routinely receive discharge letters remains unclear.

Methods and analysis: The review will consolidate evidence on patients receiving discharge letters through the theory-driven approach of a realist review.The review will be conducted systematically and seek to explain how, why, for whom and in what contexts does this practice 'work'. The review will specifically explore whether there are benefits of this practice and if so what are the important contexts for triggering the mechanisms associated with these outcome benefits. Negative effects will also be considered.Several steps will occur: devising initial rough programme theory, searching the evidence, selecting relevant documents, extracting data, synthesising and finally programme theory refinement. As the process is viewed as iterative, this cycle of steps may be repeated as many times as is necessary to reach theoretical saturation and may not be linear.The initial programme theory will be tested and refined throughout the review process and by stakeholder involvement of National Health Service (NHS) policy makers, practitioners and service users.

Ethics and dissemination: Formal ethical review is not required. The resulting programme theory is anticipated to explain how the intervention of patients receiving written discharge communication may work in practice, for whom and in what contexts; this will inform best practice of patients receiving discharge communication. The review findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations and discussions with relevant organisations and stakeholders. While the review will be from the perspective of the UK NHS, its findings should be relevant to other healthcare systems.

Prospero registration number: CRD42017069863.

Keywords: communication; discharge letter; hospital discharge; patient information; realist review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Review design.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NHS England. Standards for the communication of patient diagnostic test results on discharge from hospital. 2016. http://www.england.nhs.uk/patientsafety/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2016... (accessed Jan 2017).
    1. Department of Health. Copying letters to patients: good practice guidelines, 2003. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ (accessed 9 May 2017).
    1. Department of Health. The NHS plan. 2000. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk (accessed 2 Jun 2017).
    1. White P. Copying referral letters to patients: prepare for change. Patient Educ Couns 2004;54:159–61. 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00203-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pothier DD, Nakivell P, Hall CE. What do patients think about being copied into their GP letters? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:718–21. 10.1308/003588407X205413 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources