Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e018614.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018614.

Barriers and facilitators to orthopaedic surgeons' uptake of decision aids for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Barriers and facilitators to orthopaedic surgeons' uptake of decision aids for total knee arthroplasty: a qualitative study

Samantha Bunzli et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. Differentiating who will derive a clinically meaningful improvement from TKA from others is a key challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Decision aids can help surgeons select appropriate candidates for surgery, but their uptake has been low. The aim of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators to decision aid uptake among orthopaedic surgeons.

Design: A qualitative study involving face-to-face interviews. Questions were constructed on the Theoretical Domains Framework to systematically explore barriers and facilitators.

Setting: One tertiary hospital in Australia.

Participants: Twenty orthopaedic surgeons performing TKA.

Outcome measures: Beliefs underlying similar interview responses were identified and grouped together as themes describing relevant barriers and facilitators to uptake of decision aids.

Results: While prioritising their clinical acumen, surgeons believed a decision aid could enhance communication and patient informed consent. Barriers identified included the perception that one's patient outcomes were already optimal; a perceived lack of non-operative alternatives for the management of end-stage osteoarthritis, concerns about mandatory cut-offs for patient-centred care and concerns about the medicolegal implications of using a decision aid.

Conclusions: Multifaceted implementation interventions are required to ensure that orthopaedic surgeons are ready, willing and able to use a TKA decision aid. Audit/feedback to address current decision-making biases such as overconfidence may enhance readiness to uptake. Policy changes and/or incentives may enhance willingness to uptake. Finally, the design/implementation of effective non-operative treatments may enhance ability to uptake by ensuring that surgeons have the resources they need to carry out decisions.

Keywords: Knee; Total Knee Arthroplasty; decision aids; implementation; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Cobos R, Latorre A, Aizpuru F, et al. . Variability of indication criteria in knee and hip replacement: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:249 10.1186/1471-2474-11-249 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dowsey MM, Smith AJ, Choong PFM. Latent class growth analysis predicts long term pain and function trajectories in total knee arthroplasty: a study of 689 patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015;23:2141–9. 10.1016/j.joca.2015.07.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Australian Orthopaedic Association. Annual report. Adelaide: National Joint Replacement Registry, 2014.
    1. Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, Hayes CW. Use of a validated algorithm to judge the appropriateness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:2134–43. 10.1002/art.38685 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curtis AJ, Wolfe R, Russell CO, et al. . Determining priority for joint replacement: comparing the views of orthopaedic surgeons and other professionals. Med J Aust 2011;195:699–702. 10.5694/mja10.11052 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources