Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e018833.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018833.

Barriers and facilitators to learn and improve through morbidity and mortality conferences: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Barriers and facilitators to learn and improve through morbidity and mortality conferences: a qualitative study

Marit S de Vos et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To explore barriers and facilitators to successful morbidity and mortality conferences (M&M), driving learning and improvement.

Design: This is a qualitative study with semistructured interviews. Inductive, thematic content analysis was used to identify barriers and facilitators, which were structured across a pre-existing framework for change in healthcare.

Setting: Dutch academic surgical department with a long tradition of M&M.

Participants: An interview sample of surgeons, residents and physician assistants (n=12).

Results: A total of 57 barriers and facilitators to successful M&M, covering 18 themes, varying from 'case type' to 'leadership', were perceived by surgical staff. While some factors related to M&M organisation, others concerned individual or social aspects. Eight factors, of which four were at the social level, had simultaneous positive and negative effects (eg, 'hierarchy' and 'team spirit'). Mediating pathways for M&M success were found to relate to available information, staff motivation and realisation processes.

Conclusions: This study provides leads for improvement of M&M practice, as well as for further research on key elements of successful M&M. Various factors were perceived to affect M&M success, of which many were individual and social rather than organisational factors, affecting information and realisation processes but also staff motivation. Based on these findings, practical recommendations were formulated to guide efforts towards best practices for M&M.

Keywords: barriers and facilitators; continuing education; morbidity and mortality conferences; patient safety; professionals; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Xiong X, Johnson T, Jayaraman D, et al. . At the crossroad with morbidity and mortality conferences: lessons learned through a narrative systematic review. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;2016:1–11. 10.1155/2016/7679196 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orlander JD, Barber TW, Fincke BG. The morbidity and mortality conference: the delicate nature of learning from error. Acad Med 2002;77:1001–6. - PubMed
    1. Aboumatar HJ, Blackledge CG, Dickson C, et al. . A descriptive study of morbidity and mortality conferences and their conformity to medical incident analysis models: results of the morbidity and mortality conference improvement study, phase 1. Am J Med Qual 2007;22:232–8. 10.1177/1062860607303292 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, et al. . The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1051–6. 10.1056/NEJMsr1200117 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sacks GD, Lawson EH, Tillou A, et al. . Morbidity and mortality conference 2.0. Ann Surg 2015;262:228–9. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001268 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources