Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov;15(6):570-577.
doi: 10.1370/afm.2150.

The Foundations Framework for Developing and Reporting New Models of Care for Multimorbidity

Affiliations
Review

The Foundations Framework for Developing and Reporting New Models of Care for Multimorbidity

Jonathan Stokes et al. Ann Fam Med. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: Multimorbidity challenges health systems globally. New models of care are urgently needed to better manage patients with multimorbidity; however, there is no agreed framework for designing and reporting models of care for multimorbidity and their evaluation.

Methods: Based on findings from a literature search to identify models of care for multimorbidity, we developed a framework to describe these models. We illustrate the application of the framework by identifying the focus and gaps in current models of care, and by describing the evolution of models over time.

Results: Our framework describes each model in terms of its theoretical basis and target population (the foundations of the model) and of the elements of care implemented to deliver the model. We categorized elements of care into 3 types: (1) clinical focus, (2) organization of care, (3) support for model delivery. Application of the framework identified a limited use of theory in model design and a strong focus on some patient groups (elderly, high users) more than others (younger patients, deprived populations). We found changes in elements with time, with a decrease in models implementing home care and an increase in models offering extended appointments.

Conclusions: By encouragin greater clarity about the underpinning theory and target population, and by categorizing the wide range of potentially important elements of an intervention to improve care for patients with multimorbidity, the framework may be useful in designing and reporting models of care and help advance the currently limited evidence base.

Keywords: chronic disease; framework; health systems; models of care; multimorbidity; primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: authors report none.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The foundations framework.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of models in the current literature using each element of the framework. IT=information technology; MDT=multidisciplinary team.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Model development over time. IT=information technology; MDT=multidisciplinary team. Note: Difference = the percentage of models described in 2010 or later implementing the element less the percentage of models described before 2010 implementing the element.

References

    1. Omran AR. The epidemiologic transition. A theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1971;49(4): 509–538. - PubMed
    1. Boutayeb A. The double burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases in developing countries. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2006;100(3):191–199. - PubMed
    1. Boyd CM, Fortin M. Future of multimorbidity research: How should understanding of multimorbidity inform health system design? Public Health Rev. 2011;33(2):451–474.
    1. Nolte E, McKee M. Caring for people with chronic conditions: a health system perspective. 2008. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/96468/E91878.pdf Accessed Jan 10, 2013.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services: interim report. 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/155002/1/WHO_HIS_SDS_2015.6_eng... Accessed Jan 2, 2016.

MeSH terms