Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2017 Nov 13;7(1):15372.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15782-y.

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery

Yong Huang et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in patients with previous abdominal surgery (PAS). The outcomes were compared in 139 patients (103 upper and 36 lower abdominal surgeries) with PAS and 361 without PAS who underwent LCBDE. The operative time, hospital stay, rate of open conversion, postoperative complications, duct clearance, and blood loss were compared. Patients with PAS had longer operative times (P = 0.006), higher hospital costs (P = 0.043), and a higher incidence of wound complications (P = 0.011) than those without PAS. However, there were no statistically significant in the open conversion rate, blood loss, hospital stay, bile leakage, biliary strictures, residual stones, and mortality between patients with and without PAS (P > 0.05). Moreover, compared with those without PAS, patients with previous upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) had longer operative times (P = 0.005), higher hospital costs (P = 0.030), and a higher open conversion rate (P = 0.043), but patients with previous lower abdominal surgery (PLAS) had a higher incidence of wound complications (P = 0.022). LCBDE is considered safe and feasible for patients with PAS, including those with PUAS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Jan YY, et al. Surgical treatment of hepatolithiasis: long-term results. Surgery. 1996;120:509–14. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80071-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cheon YK, Cho YD, Moon JH, Lee JS, Shim CS. Evaluation of long-term results and recurrent factors after operative and nonoperative treatment for hepatolithiasis. Surgery. 2009;146:843–53. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.04.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu B, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for common bile duct stone-related nonsevere acute cholangitis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11748. doi: 10.1038/srep11748. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feng Qian, et al. Laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration: Advantages over laparoscopic choledochotomy. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0162885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162885. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lei J, et al. Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration: T-Shaped Incision of Cystic Duct with FREDDY Laser Lithotripsy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016;26:646–51. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0004. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources