Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Oct 4;4(10):170470.
doi: 10.1098/rsos.170470. eCollection 2017 Oct.

Cancer and intercellular cooperation

Affiliations
Review

Cancer and intercellular cooperation

Marta Bertolaso et al. R Soc Open Sci. .

Abstract

The major transitions approach in evolutionary biology has shown that the intercellular cooperation that characterizes multicellular organisms would never have emerged without some kind of multilevel selection. Relying on this view, the Evolutionary Somatic view of cancer considers cancer as a breakdown of intercellular cooperation and as a loss of the balance between selection processes that take place at different levels of organization (particularly single cell and individual organism). This seems an elegant unifying framework for healthy organism, carcinogenesis, tumour proliferation, metastasis and other phenomena such as ageing. However, the gene-centric version of Darwinian evolution, which is often adopted in cancer research, runs into empirical problems: proto-tumoural and tumoural features in precancerous cells that would undergo 'natural selection' have proved hard to demonstrate; cells are radically context-dependent, and some stages of cancer are poorly related to genetic change. Recent perspectives propose that breakdown of intercellular cooperation could depend on 'fields' and other higher-level phenomena, and could be even mutations independent. Indeed, the field would be the context, allowing (or preventing) genetic mutations to undergo an intra-organism process analogous to natural selection. The complexities surrounding somatic evolution call for integration between multiple incomplete frameworks for interpreting intercellular cooperation and its pathologies.

Keywords: cancer; cooperation; evolutionary transitions; inclusive fitness; multilevel selection; natural selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no competing interests.

References

    1. Little MP. 2010. Cancer models, genomic instability and somatic cellular Darwinian evolution. Biol. Direct. 5, 19; discussion 19 (doi:10.1186/1745-6150-5-19) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greaves M, Maley CC. 2012. Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature 481, 306–313. (doi:10.1038/nature10762) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. 2000. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. 2011. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marusyk A. 2017. Obstacles to the Darwinian framework of somatic cancer evolution. In Ecology and evolution of cancer (eds Ujvari B, Roche B, Thomas F), pp. 223–227. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.