A free-boundary model of a motile cell explains turning behavior
- PMID: 29136638
- PMCID: PMC5705165
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005862
A free-boundary model of a motile cell explains turning behavior
Abstract
To understand shapes and movements of cells undergoing lamellipodial motility, we systematically explore minimal free-boundary models of actin-myosin contractility consisting of the force-balance and myosin transport equations. The models account for isotropic contraction proportional to myosin density, viscous stresses in the actin network, and constant-strength viscous-like adhesion. The contraction generates a spatially graded centripetal actin flow, which in turn reinforces the contraction via myosin redistribution and causes retraction of the lamellipodial boundary. Actin protrusion at the boundary counters the retraction, and the balance of the protrusion and retraction shapes the lamellipodium. The model analysis shows that initiation of motility critically depends on three dimensionless parameter combinations, which represent myosin-dependent contractility, a characteristic viscosity-adhesion length, and a rate of actin protrusion. When the contractility is sufficiently strong, cells break symmetry and move steadily along either straight or circular trajectories, and the motile behavior is sensitive to conditions at the cell boundary. Scanning of a model parameter space shows that the contractile mechanism of motility supports robust cell turning in conditions where short viscosity-adhesion lengths and fast protrusion cause an accumulation of myosin in a small region at the cell rear, destabilizing the axial symmetry of a moving cell.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Lamellipodial actin mechanically links myosin activity with adhesion-site formation.Cell. 2007 Feb 9;128(3):561-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.039. Cell. 2007. PMID: 17289574 Free PMC article.
-
Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 1;109(18):6851-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203252109. Epub 2012 Apr 9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. PMID: 22493219 Free PMC article.
-
Actin-myosin viscoelastic flow in the keratocyte lamellipod.Biophys J. 2009 Oct 7;97(7):1853-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.07.020. Biophys J. 2009. PMID: 19804715 Free PMC article.
-
Actin-dependent motile forces and cell motility.Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;6(1):82-6. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90120-1. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994. PMID: 8167030 Review.
-
Organization and polarity of actin filament networks in cells: implications for the mechanism of myosin-based cell motility.Biochem Soc Symp. 1999;65:173-205. Biochem Soc Symp. 1999. PMID: 10320939 Review.
Cited by
-
Active poroelastic two-phase model for the motion of physarum microplasmodia.PLoS One. 2019 Aug 9;14(8):e0217447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217447. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31398215 Free PMC article.
-
Membrane Tension Can Enhance Adaptation to Maintain Polarity of Migrating Cells.Biophys J. 2020 Oct 20;119(8):1617-1629. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.08.035. Epub 2020 Sep 7. Biophys J. 2020. PMID: 32976760 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling cell protrusion predicts how myosin II and actin turnover affect adhesion-based signaling.Biophys J. 2022 Jan 4;121(1):102-118. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.11.2889. Epub 2021 Dec 1. Biophys J. 2022. PMID: 34861242 Free PMC article.
-
Actin assembly produces sufficient forces for endocytosis in yeast.Mol Biol Cell. 2019 Jul 22;30(16):2014-2024. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E19-01-0059. Epub 2019 Jun 26. Mol Biol Cell. 2019. PMID: 31242058 Free PMC article.
-
Coupling cell shape and velocity leads to oscillation and circling in keratocyte galvanotaxis.Biophys J. 2023 Jan 3;122(1):130-142. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.11.021. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Biophys J. 2023. PMID: 36397670 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ridley AJ, Schwartz MA, Burridge K, Firtel RA, Ginsberg MH, Borisy G, et al. Cell migration: integrating signals from front to back. Science 2003. December 5;302(5651):1704–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1092053 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lämmermann T, Sixt M. Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009. October;21(5):636–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Verkhovsky AB. The mechanisms of spatial and temporal patterning of cell-edge dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015. October;36: 113–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.09.001 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Keren K, Pincus Z, Allen GM, Barnhart EL, Marriott G, Mogilner A, et al. Mechanism of shape determination in motile cells. Nature 2008. May 22;453(7194):475–80. doi: 10.1038/nature06952 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Barnhart EL, Lee KC, Keren K, Mogilner A, Theriot JA. An adhesion-dependent switch between mechanisms that determine motile cell shape. PLoS Biol. 2011. May;9(5): e1001059 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001059 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources