Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Nov;96(45):e8101.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008101.

Prognostic role of pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prognostic role of pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Xu Liu et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Inflammation and cancer are closely related to each other. As a parameter that can reflect inflammation and host immune reaction, elevated blood neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been confirmed to be correlated with poor prognosis in a variety of cancers. However, this remains controversial in breast cancer. Thus, we performed this updated meta-analysis to further clarify whether high NLR could be a predictor of survival in breast cancer patients.

Methods: We searched on PubMed Database and Cochrane Library. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival were used as outcome events, and hazard ratio (HR) was chosen as the parameter to evaluate the correlation.

Result: Eighteen eligible studies were involved in this meta-analysis. The synthesized analysis demonstrated that elevated NLR was associated with poor DFS [HR = 1.72, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.30-2.27], OS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.41-2.48), and cancer-specific survival (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.04-4.21). The correlation was stronger in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (OS: HR = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.63-4.06; DFS: HR = 3.51, 95% CI = 1.97-6.24).

Conclusion: Higher NLR was correlated to poor prognosis of breast cancer patients. As a clinical parameter that we can easily obtain, NLR might be a potential predictor in patients' survival to assist with physicians' treatment decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow graph of searching process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forrest plots of survival: (A) HR for disease-free survival; (B) HR for overall survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forrest plots of survival: (A) HR for survival in TNBC; (B) HR for cancer-specific survival.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Begg funnel plot: (A) estimated publication bias in pooled analysis of disease-free survival; (B) estimated publication bias in pooled analysis of overall survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, et al. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 2015;1:505–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:115–32. - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:5–29. - PubMed
    1. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:10869–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allen MD, Jones LJ. The role of inflammation in progression of breast cancer: friend or foe? (Review). Int J Oncol 2015;47:797–805. - PubMed

Publication types