Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug 24;8(48):84140-84152.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20493. eCollection 2017 Oct 13.

A novel polyamine blockade therapy activates an anti-tumor immune response

Affiliations

A novel polyamine blockade therapy activates an anti-tumor immune response

Eric T Alexander et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

Most tumors maintain elevated levels of polyamines to support their growth and survival. This study explores the anti-tumor effect of polyamine starvation via both inhibiting polyamine biosynthesis and blocking the upregulated import of polyamines into the tumor. We demonstrate that polyamine blockade therapy (PBT) co-treatment with both DFMO and a novel polyamine transport inhibitor, Trimer PTI, significantly inhibits tumor growth more than treatment with DFMO or the Trimer PTI alone. The anti-tumor effect of PBT was lost in mice where CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were antibody depleted, implying that PBT stimulates an anti-tumor immune effect that is T-cell dependent. The PBT anti-tumor effect was accompanied by an increase in granzyme B+, IFN-γ+ CD8+ T-cells and a decrease in immunosuppressive tumor infiltrating cells including Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), CD4+CD25+ Tregs, and CD206+F4/80+ M2 macrophages. Stimulation with tumor-specific peptides elicited elevated antigen-specific IFN-γ secretion in splenocytes from PBT-treated mice, indicating that PBT treatment stimulates the activation of T-cells in a tumor-specific manner. These data show that combined treatment with both DFMO and the Trimer PTI not only deprives polyamine-addicted tumor cells of polyamines, but also relieves polyamine-mediated immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment, thus allowing the activation of tumoricidal T-cells.

Keywords: difluoromethylornithine; immunomodulation; polyamines; transport inhibitor; tumor microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Both the composition of matter and use of the Trimer PTI with DFMO in the treatment of cancers have been patented by UCF. As outlined in a collaborative research agreement, both UCF and the Lankenau Institute for Medical Research will equally share future royalties related to commercialization of this intellectual property. A patent application for the use of the Trimer PTI plus DFMO as immunomodulatory therapy has been filed jointly by LIMR and UCF.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structure of DFMO and Trimer PTI
Polyamine blockade therapy consists of combined treatment with α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO, an ODC inhibitor), and the Trimer PTI (N1, N1′, N1″-(benzene-1, 3, 5-triyltris(methylene))tris(N4-(4-(methylamino)butyl)butane- 1, 4-diamine), an inhibitor of the polyamine transport system [29].
Figure 2
Figure 2. B16F10-sTAC tumor growth inhibition with DFMO and Trimer PTI
(A) Mice were subcutaneously injected with 5×105 B16F10-sTAC melanoma cells. When tumors were 50-100 mm3 in size, treatment was initiated with either saline, 0.25% DFMO (w/v) in the drinking water, Trimer PTI (i.p., 3 mg/kg, once a day) or both DFMO and Trimer PTI. Graph shows B16F10-sTAC tumor growth under different treatments (mean tumor volume ± SEM). (B) Spleen weight was determined upon sacrifice (mean ± SEM). (C) Upon sacrifice, tumors were excised and weighed (mean ± SEM). (D) Polyamine levels were determined in tumors by HPLC and normalized to DNA levels in the tissue extracts (nmol/mg DNA). (E) Tumor and non-tumor bearing skin tissues were excised from PBT-treated mice, flash frozen, finely pulverized in liquid nitrogen with mortar and pestle, homogenized in a solution of 33% water, 66% methanol and 1% acetic acid, and then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min at 25°C. Trimer PTI levels were determined in tumor and skin supernatants by mass spectrometry and normalized to tissue protein concentration (nmol/mg protein). n = 5-10 mice per group; * = p ≤ 0.05 and # = p ≤ 0.01 compared to vehicle-treated mice.
Figure 3
Figure 3. DFMO and Trimer PTI co-treatment increases cytotoxic T-cell activity and promotes macrophage infiltration of the tumor
(A) The frequency of IFN-γ producing T-cells was measured by the ELISpot assay as IFN-γ spot forming units (SFU) per million spleen cells. (B) The number of F4/80+ cells per million B16F10-sTAC melanoma cells from either vehicle treated mice or mice co-treated with DFMO and Trimer PTI. Representative images of B16F10-sTAC tumor sections from mice treated with vehicle (C) or DFMO and Trimer PTI (D) and stained for F4/80+ macrophages. n = 5-10 mice per group; * = p ≤ 0.05 and # = p ≤ 0.01 compared to vehicle treated mice.
Figure 4
Figure 4. DFMO and Trimer PTI co-treatment increases levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in B16F10-sTAC tumors
Upon sacrifice, tumors were excised, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and then homogenized to produce tumor lysates which were assayed for levels of TNF-α, IL-10, IFN-γ, IL-6, MCP-1 and VEGF by Cytokine Bead Array or ELISA. n = 5-10 mice per group; * = p ≤ 0.05 and # = p ≤ 0.01 compared to indicated group.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells reverses PBT inhibition of tumor growth
(A) Mice were subcutaneously injected with 5×105 CT26.CL25 colon carcinoma cells. When tumors were 50-100 mm3 in size, treatment was initiated with either saline or 0.25% DFMO (w/v) in the drinking water plus Trimer PTI (i.p. 3 mg/kg, once a day). Mice in the anti-CD4/CD8 groups were i.p. injected with 75 μg of anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibodies every three days starting 3 days prior to the initiation of treatment with a total of four doses. Graph shows CT26.CL25 tumor growth under different treatments (mean tumor volume ± SEM). Upon sacrifice, tumors (B) and spleens (C) were excised and weighed (mean ± SEM). n = 5-10 mice per group; * = p ≤ 0.05 and # = p ≤ 0.01 compared to indicated group.
Figure 6
Figure 6. DFMO and Trimer PTI co-treatment reduces the immunosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic cells populations
Upon sacrifice, tumors were excised from CT26.CL25-tumor bearing mice and processed for analysis by flow cytometry. CD45+ tumor cells were analyzed for the percentage of the indicated cell subpopulations. n = 5-10 mice per group; * = p ≤ 0.05 and # = p ≤ 0.01 compared to indicated group.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Co-treatment with DFMO and Trimer PTI increases the cytotoxic T-cell activity in the tumor
Upon sacrifice, tumors were excised from CT26.CL25-tumor bearing mice and infiltrating leukocytes were isolated by discontinuous Percoll gradients. CD8+ T-cells were analyzed for the percentage of IFN-γ+ (A and B) and granzyme B+ (A and C) cells by flow cytometry. (D) The frequency of IFN-γ producing T-cells was measured by the ELISpot assay as IFN-γ spot forming units (SFU) per 5 x105 tumor infiltrating leukocytes. n = 5-10 mice per group; * = p ≤ 0.05 and # = p ≤ 0.01 compared to indicated group.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Co-treatment with DFMO and Trimer PTI decreases the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs
(A) One week prior to sacrifice, MDSCs were isolated from the spleens of CT26.CL25 tumor-bearing mice that were treated either with vehicle or Co-treatment with DFMO and Trimer PTI decreases. Isolated MDSCs (5.2 × 106 per mouse) were then adoptively transferred into separate groups of recipient tumor-bearing mice in the PBT-treated group. (B) Upon sacrifice, splenocytes from the recipient mice were used to measure the frequency of IFN-γ producing T-cells by ELISpot assay following challenge with tumor-expressing β-galactosidase peptide. n = 5-10 mice per group; * = p ≤ 0.05 and # = p ≤ 0.01 compared to indicated group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rebucci M, Michiels C. Molecular aspects of cancer cell resistance to chemotherapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85:1219–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2013.02.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dobbelstein M, Moll U. Targeting tumour-supportive cellular machineries in anticancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:179–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4201. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao J. Cancer stem cells and chemoresistance: the smartest survives the raid. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;160:145–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.02.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colotta F, Allavena P, Sica A, Garlanda C, Mantovani A. Cancer-related inflammation, the seventh hallmark of cancer: links to genetic instability. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:1073–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgp127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pegg AE. Polyamine metabolism and its importance in neoplastic growth as a target for chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 1988;48:759–74. - PubMed