Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2017 Nov 15;15(1):202.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0962-x.

DIET@NET: Best Practice Guidelines for dietary assessment in health research

Collaborators, Affiliations
Practice Guideline

DIET@NET: Best Practice Guidelines for dietary assessment in health research

Janet E Cade et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Dietary assessment is complex, and strategies to select the most appropriate dietary assessment tool (DAT) in epidemiological research are needed. The DIETary Assessment Tool NETwork (DIET@NET) aimed to establish expert consensus on Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) for dietary assessment using self-report.

Methods: The BPGs were developed using the Delphi technique. Two Delphi rounds were conducted. A total of 131 experts were invited, and of these 65 accepted, with 48 completing Delphi round I and 51 completing Delphi round II. In all, a total of 57 experts from North America, Europe, Asia and Australia commented on the 47 suggested guidelines.

Results: Forty-three guidelines were generated, grouped into the following four stages: Stage I. Define what is to be measured in terms of dietary intake (what? who? and when?); Stage II. Investigate different types of DATs; Stage III. Evaluate existing tools to select the most appropriate DAT by evaluating published validation studies; Stage IV. Think through the implementation of the chosen DAT and consider sources of potential biases.

Conclusions: The Delphi technique consolidated expert views on best practice in assessing dietary intake. The BPGs provide a valuable guide for health researchers to choose the most appropriate dietary assessment method for their studies. These guidelines will be accessible through the Nutritools website, www.nutritools.org .

Keywords: Dietary assessment methods; Guidelines; Nutrition; Nutritional epidemiology; Public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests. The University of Leeds is establishing a spin-out company, myfood24, for our new online dietary assessment tool. Professor Janet Cade is a director and shareholder of myfood24.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Steps for the development of the Best Practice Guidelines for dietary assessment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Experts of the Delphi consultation rounds

References

    1. Shim J-S, Oh K, Kim HC. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol Health. 2014;36:e2014009. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farley TA, Rice J, Bodor JN, Cohen DA, Bluthenthal RN, Rose D. Measuring the foodenvironment: shelf space of fruits, vegetables, and snack foods in stores. J Urban Health. 2009;86(5):672–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beaton GH, Burema J, Ritenbaugh C. Errors in the interpretation of dietary assessments. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(4):1100S–7S. - PubMed
    1. Illner A-K, Freisling H, Boeing H, Huybrechts I, Crispim S, Slimani N. Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(4):1187–203. - PubMed
    1. Dietary Assessment Primer.: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. https://dietassessmentprimer.cancer.gov/. Accessed 22 Aug 2017.

Publication types