The diagnostic value and histologic correlate of distinct patterns of shiny white streaks for the diagnosis of melanoma: A retrospective, case-control study
- PMID: 29138058
- PMCID: PMC7480004
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.021
The diagnostic value and histologic correlate of distinct patterns of shiny white streaks for the diagnosis of melanoma: A retrospective, case-control study
Abstract
Background: Shiny white streaks (SWSs) are best visualized with polarized dermoscopy and correlate with dermal fibroplasia histopathologically. SWSs have been described at higher frequencies in melanomas than in benign nevi.
Objective: We assessed the diagnostic value of different patterns of SWSs and their histologic correlate in melanocytic lesions.
Methods: Polarized dermoscopic images of 1507 histopathologically diagnosed melanocytic neoplasms were analyzed for presence and pattern of SWSs. Histology was also reviewed for correlation.
Results: Among 1507 melanocytic neoplasms, SWSs were observed in 31 of 144 melanomas (22%) and 22 of 1363 benign neoplasms (1.6%) (P < .001). The sensitivity and specificity of SWSs for melanoma were 22% and 98%, respectively. Diffuse SWSs exhibited the greatest diagnostic value for melanoma, with sensitivity of 11.8% and specificity of 99.5%. Focal central and peripheral SWSs were comparable in diagnostic significance. The presence of SWSs was highly uncommon in dysplastic nevi, whereas in certain benign subgroups of nevi such as Spitz nevi and atypical genital special site nevi, SWSs were not uncommon. Diffuse SWSs correlated with greater breadth of deep fibroplasia than focal SWSs (P = .009), and SWSs correlated with greater Breslow depth among melanomas (P = .007).
Limitations: This study was retrospective.
Conclusion: Polarized dermoscopy is a valuable diagnostic tool in the identification of SWSs, a feature that is highly specific for melanoma.
Keywords: crystalline/chrysalis structures; dermoscopy; histology; melanoma; nevi; pigmented skin lesions; polarized dermoscopy; shiny white streaks.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: Dr Gerami has served as a consultant to Castle Biosciences Inc, Myriad Genetics, and DermTech Inc and has received honoraria for this. Dr Verzi, Mr Quan, Dr Walton, Dr Martini, Dr Marghoob, Ms Garfield, Dr Kong, Dr Isales, Dr VandenBoom, Mr Zhang, and Dr West have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Benvenuto-Andrade C, Dusza SW, Agero AL, et al. Differences between polarized light dermoscopy and immersion contact dermoscopy for the evaluation of skin lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143:329–338. - PubMed
-
- Pan Y, Gareau DS, Scope A, Rajadhyaksha M, Mullani NA, Marghoob AA. Polarized and nonpolarized dermoscopy: the explanation for the observed differences. Arch Dermatol. 2008; 144:828–829. - PubMed
-
- Botella-Estrada R, Requena C, Traves V, Nagore E, Guillen C. Chrysalis and negative pigment network in Spitz nevi. Am J Dermatopathol. 2012;34:188–191. - PubMed
-
- Pizzichetta MA, Canzonieri V, Soyer PH, Rubegni P, Talamini R, Massone C. Negative pigment network and shiny white streaks: a dermoscopic-pathological correlation study. Am J Dermatopathol. 2014;36:433–438. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
