Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 14;8(6):e01780-17.
doi: 10.1128/mBio.01780-17.

Key Metabolites and Mechanistic Changes for Salt Tolerance in an Experimentally Evolved Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium, Desulfovibrio vulgaris

Affiliations

Key Metabolites and Mechanistic Changes for Salt Tolerance in an Experimentally Evolved Sulfate-Reducing Bacterium, Desulfovibrio vulgaris

Aifen Zhou et al. mBio. .

Abstract

Rapid genetic and phenotypic adaptation of the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough to salt stress was observed during experimental evolution. In order to identify key metabolites important for salt tolerance, a clone, ES10-5, which was isolated from population ES10 and allowed to experimentally evolve under salt stress for 5,000 generations, was analyzed and compared to clone ES9-11, which was isolated from population ES9 and had evolved under the same conditions for 1,200 generations. These two clones were chosen because they represented the best-adapted clones among six independently evolved populations. ES10-5 acquired new mutations in genes potentially involved in salt tolerance, in addition to the preexisting mutations and different mutations in the same genes as in ES9-11. Most basal abundance changes of metabolites and phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) were lower in ES10-5 than ES9-11, but an increase of glutamate and branched PLFA i17:1ω9c under high-salinity conditions was persistent. ES9-11 had decreased cell motility compared to the ancestor; in contrast, ES10-5 showed higher cell motility under both nonstress and high-salinity conditions. Both genotypes displayed better growth energy efficiencies than the ancestor under nonstress or high-salinity conditions. Consistently, ES10-5 did not display most of the basal transcriptional changes observed in ES9-11, but it showed increased expression of genes involved in glutamate biosynthesis, cation efflux, and energy metabolism under high salinity. These results demonstrated the role of glutamate as a key osmolyte and i17:1ω9c as the major PLFA for salt tolerance in D. vulgaris The mechanistic changes in evolved genotypes suggested that growth energy efficiency might be a key factor for selection.IMPORTANCE High salinity (e.g., elevated NaCl) is a stressor that affects many organisms. Salt tolerance, a complex trait involving multiple cellular pathways, is attractive for experimental evolutionary studies. Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough is a model sulfate-reducing bacterium (SRB) that is important in biogeochemical cycling of sulfur, carbon, and nitrogen, potentially for bio-corrosion, and for bioremediation of toxic heavy metals and radionuclides. The coexistence of SRB and high salinity in natural habitats and heavy metal-contaminated field sites laid the foundation for the study of salt adaptation of D. vulgaris Hildenborough with experimental evolution. Here, we analyzed a clone that evolved under salt stress for 5,000 generations and compared it to a clone evolved under the same condition for 1,200 generations. The results indicated the key roles of glutamate for osmoprotection and of i17:1ω9c for increasing membrane fluidity during salt adaptation. The findings provide valuable insights about the salt adaptation mechanism changes during long-term experimental evolution.

Keywords: Desulfovibrio vulgaris; PLFA; cell motility; energy efficiency; genomic mutations; organic solutes; transcriptomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Growth curves of colony-based salt-evolved D. vulgaris Hildenborough strains ES10-5 and ES9-11 and the ancestral strain (An) grown in LS4D, LS4D plus 250 mM NaCl, or LS4D plus 300 mM NaCl.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Accumulation of organic solutes in ES10-5, ES9-11, and the ancestral strain under nonstress conditions (LS4D) or high-salinity conditions (LS4D plus 300 mM NaCl). *, significant changes were induced under high-salinity conditions (LSD test, P < 0.05).
FIG 3
FIG 3
PLFA compositions in ES10-5, ES9-11, and the ancestral strain under nonstress conditions (LS4D) or high-salinity conditions (LS4D plus 300 mM NaCl). *, significant change induced by high salinity (LSD test, P < 0.05).
FIG 4
FIG 4
Physiological and transcriptional responses to high salinity for ES10-5, ES9-11, and the ancestral strain (An). (A) Cell motility. (B) Heat generated per cell under nonstress conditions (LS4D) and after transfer into high-salinity medium (LS4D plus 250 mM NaCl; transition). (C) DCA results for global transcriptional profiles. A subscript C after a strain designation indicates cells were cultured in LS4D; a subscript T after a strain designation indicates cells were cultured in LS4D plus 300 mM NaCl.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Herring CD, Raghunathan A, Honisch C, Patel T, Applebee MK, Joyce AR, Albert TJ, Blattner FR, van den Boom D, Cantor CR, Palsson BØ. 2006. Comparative genome sequencing of Escherichia coli allows observation of bacterial evolution on a laboratory timescale. Nat Genet 38:1406–1412. doi:10.1038/ng1906. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guidot A, Jiang W, Ferdy JB, Thébaud C, Barberis P, Gouzy J, Genin S. 2014. Multihost experimental evolution of the pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum unveils genes involved in adaptation to plants. Mol Biol Evol 31:2913–2928. doi:10.1093/molbev/msu229. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brockhurst MA, Colegrave N, Rozen DE. 2011. Next-generation sequencing as a tool to study microbial evolution. Mol Ecol 20:972–980. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04835.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dettman JR, Rodrigue N, Melnyk AH, Wong A, Bailey SF, Kassen R. 2012. Evolutionary insight from whole-genome sequencing of experimentally evolved microbes. Mol Ecol 21:2058–2077. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05484.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kawecki TJ, Lenski RE, Ebert D, Hollis B, Olivieri I, Whitlock MC. 2012. Experimental evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 27:547–560. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.06.001. - DOI - PubMed