Effect of interpregnancy interval on the success rate of trial of labor after cesarean
- PMID: 29138524
- DOI: 10.1038/jp.2017.117
Effect of interpregnancy interval on the success rate of trial of labor after cesarean
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the association between interpregnancy interval and success of vaginal birth after cesarean.
Study design: Retrospective 10-year cohort study of pregnant women with one prior cesarean, who opted for trial of labor (n=36 653). Interpregnancy interval is the time between cesarean and next conception. Vaginal birth success rates were compared between six interval groups. Analysis was performed pooled as well as stratified for induction of labor. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated.
Results: Success rate in the reference group (12 to 24 months) was 72%. Success rates were similar among those with an interval of less than 24 months. Intervals of 24 months or more showed a decrease in success rate; 70% in 24- to 35-month intervals (adjusted odds ratio 0.92 (0.87 to 0.98)), 67% in 36- to 59-month intervals (adjusted odds ratio 0.87 (0.81 to 0.94)) and 62% in intervals of more than 60 months (adjusted odds ratio 0.77 (0.67 to 0.88)).
Conclusion: An interpregnancy interval of <24 months is not associated with a decreased success of vaginal birth after cesarean. Success rates decrease when interval increases.
Similar articles
-
Interpregnancy body mass index change and success of term vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;210(4):330.e1-330.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Nov 8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24215856
-
Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1075-82. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000286759.49895.46. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17978122
-
Obstetrician call schedule and obstetric outcomes among women eligible for a trial of labor after cesarean.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):75.e1-75.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.032. Epub 2016 Aug 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27589899 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of the effects of birth spacing after cesarean delivery on maternal and perinatal outcomes.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Oct;147(1):19-28. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12895. Epub 2019 Jul 9. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 31233214
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
Cited by
-
Establishment of an antepartum predictive scoring model to identify candidates for vaginal birth after cesarean.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 20;20(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03231-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 33081753 Free PMC article.
-
Once a cesarean, always a cesarean? Obstetricians' approach to counseling for trial of labor after cesarean.AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Mar 13;2(2):100054. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100054. eCollection 2022 May. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022. PMID: 36275499 Free PMC article.
-
Decision-making during trial of labour after caesarean; a qualitative study with gynaecologists.PLoS One. 2018 Jul 18;13(7):e0199887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199887. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30020944 Free PMC article.
-
How birth outcomes among a cohort of Guatemalan women with a history of prior cesarean vary by mode or birth across different interpregnancy intervals.Reprod Health. 2021 May 21;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01153-4. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 34020660 Free PMC article.
-
Parity and Interval from Previous Delivery-Influence on Perinatal Outcome in Advanced Maternal Age Parturients.J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 26;10(3):460. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030460. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33530313 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources