Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Nov 15;8(6):933-946.
doi: 10.3945/an.117.016691. Print 2017 Nov.

Dietary Strategies to Reduce Environmental Impact: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base

Affiliations
Review

Dietary Strategies to Reduce Environmental Impact: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base

Bradley G Ridoutt et al. Adv Nutr. .

Abstract

The food system is a major source of environmental impact, and dietary change has been recommended as an important and necessary strategy to reduce this impact. However, assessing the environmental performance of diets is complex due to the many types of foods eaten and the diversity of agricultural production systems and local environmental settings. To assess the state of science and identify knowledge gaps, an integrative review of the broad topic of environment and diet was undertaken, with particular focus on the completeness of coverage of environmental concerns and the metrics used. Compared with the 14 discrete environmental areas of concern identified in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the located journal literature mainly addressed greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and, to a lesser extent, land and water use. Some relevant concerns were rarely addressed or not addressed at all. In the case of GHG emissions, changes in land use and soil carbon stocks were seldom considered. This represents a disconnect between the science informing strategic climate action in the agricultural sector and the science informing public health nutrition. In the case of land and water use, few studies used metrics that are appropriate in a life-cycle context. Some metrics produce inherently biased results, which misinform about environmental impact. The limited evidence generally points to recommended diets having lower environmental impacts than typical diets, although not in every case. This is largely explained by the overconsumption of food energy associated with average diets, which is also a major driver of obesity. A shared-knowledge framework is identified as being needed to guide future research on this topic. Until the evidence base becomes more complete, commentators on sustainable diets should not be quick to assume that a dietary strategy to reduce overall environmental impact can be readily defined or recommended.

Keywords: United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; climate change; dietary guidelines; environmental impact assessment; greenhouse gas emissions; land use; life cycle assessment; sustainable diet; water use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author disclosures: BGR has undertaken food systems research related to environmental issues for a variety of private sector organizations and Australian government agencies. GAH and MN undertake contract research for several companies and nongovernmental organizations on a fee-for-service basis unrelated to environmental issues.

References

    1. Garnett T. Plating up solutions. Science 2016;353:1202–4. - PubMed
    1. Drewnowski A. Healthy diets for a healthy planet. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;99:1284–5. - PubMed
    1. Stehfest E. Food choices for health and planet. Nature 2014;515:501–2. - PubMed
    1. UN Environment Program. Assessing the environmental impacts of consumption and production: priority products and materials. Paris: UN Environment Program; 2010.
    1. Tukker A, Huppes G, Guinée J, Heijungs R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Suh S, Geerken T, Van Holderbeke M, Jansen B, et al. . Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO). Technical report EUR22284EN [Internet]. Seville (Spain): EC Joint Research Centre—IPTS; 2006. [cited 2017 Feb 2]. Available from: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=1429.