Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Jun;53(3):1316-1334.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12800. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

Implicit Review Instrument to Evaluate Quality of Care Delivered by Physicians to Children in Emergency Departments

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Implicit Review Instrument to Evaluate Quality of Care Delivered by Physicians to Children in Emergency Departments

James P Marcin et al. Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the consistency, reliability, and validity of an implicit review instrument that measures the quality of care provided to children in the emergency department (ED).

Data sources/study setting: Medical records of randomly selected children from 12 EDs in the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN).

Study design: Eight pediatric emergency medicine physicians applied the instrument to 620 medical records.

Data collection/extraction methods: We determined internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and inter-rater reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We evaluated the validity of the instrument by correlating scores with four condition-specific explicit review instruments.

Principal findings: Individual reviewers' Cronbach's alpha had a mean of 0.85 with a range of 0.76-0.97; overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.90. The ICC was 0.49 for the summary score with a range from 0.40 to 0.46. Correlations between the quality of care score and the four condition-specific explicit review scores ranged from 0.24 to 0.38.

Conclusions: The quality of care instrument demonstrated good internal consistency, moderate inter-rater reliability, high inter-rater agreement, and evidence supporting validity. The instrument could be useful for systems' assessment and research in evaluating the care delivered to children in the ED.

Keywords: Pediatrics; emergency department; quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . 2014. “National Guideline Clearinghouse” [accessed on June 16, 2014]. Available at http://www.guideline.gov/
    1. Alper, J. , Sanders J., Saunders R. S., and Institute of Medicine . 2013. Roundtable on Value and Science‐Driven Health Care. Core Measurement Needs for Better Care, Better Health, and Lower Costs: Counting What Counts: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. - PubMed
    1. Alpern, E. R. , Stanley R. M., Gorelick M. H., Donaldson A., Knight S., Teach S. J., Singh T., Mahajan P., Goepp J. G., Kuppermann N., Dean J. M., and Chamberlain J. M., and Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research . 2006. “Epidemiology of a Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Network: The PECARN Core Data Project.” Pediatric Emergency Care 22 (10): 689–99. - PubMed
    1. Ashton, C. M. , Kuykendall D. H., Johnson M. L., and Wray N. P.. 1999. “An Empirical Assessment of the Validity of Explicit and Implicit Process‐of‐Care Criteria for Quality Assessment.” Medical Care 37 (8): 798–808. - PubMed
    1. Bardach, N. S. , Chien A. T., and Dudley R. A.. 2010. “Small Numbers Limit the Use of the Inpatient Pediatric Quality Indicators for Hospital Comparison.” Academic Pediatrics 10 (4): 266–73. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms