Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Mar;113(3):484-493.
doi: 10.1111/add.14033. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

Pharmacokinetics of concentrated naloxone nasal spray for opioid overdose reversal: Phase I healthy volunteer study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pharmacokinetics of concentrated naloxone nasal spray for opioid overdose reversal: Phase I healthy volunteer study

Rebecca McDonald et al. Addiction. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Background and aims: Take-home naloxone can prevent death from heroin/opioid overdose, but pre-provision is difficult because naloxone is usually given by injection. Non-injectable alternatives, including naloxone nasal sprays, are currently being developed. To be effective, the intranasal (i.n.) spray dose must be adequate but not excessive, and early absorption must be comparable to intramuscular (i.m.) injection. We report on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a specially produced concentrated novel nasal spray. The specific aims were to: (1) estimate PK profiles of i.n. naloxone, (2) compare early systemic exposure with i.n. versus i.m. naloxone and (3) estimate i.n. bioavailability.

Design: Open-label, randomized, five-way cross-over PK study.

Setting: Clinical trials facility (Croydon, UK).

Participants: Thirty-eight healthy volunteers (age 20-54 years; 11 female).

Intervention and comparator: Three doses of i.n. (1 mg/0.1 ml, 2 mg/0.1 ml, 4 mg/0.2 ml) versus 0.4 mg i.m. (reference) and 0.4 mg intravenous (i.v.) naloxone.

Measurements: Regular blood samples were taken, with high-frequency sampling during the first 15 minutes to capture early systemic exposure. PK parameters were determined from plasma naloxone concentrations. Exploratory analyses involved simulation of repeat administration.

Findings: Mean peak concentration (Cmax ) values for 1 mg (1.51 ng/ml), 2 mg (2.87 ng/ml) and 4 mg (6.02 ng/ml) i.n. exceeded 0.4 mg i.m. (1.27 ng/ml) naloxone. All three i.n. doses rapidly achieved plasma levels > 50% of peak concentrations (T50%) by 10 minutes, peaking at 15-30 minutes (Tmax ). For comparison, the i.m. reference reached Tmax at 10 minutes. Mean bioavailability was 47-51% for i.n. relative to i.m. naloxone. Simulation of repeat dosing (2 × 2 mg i.n. versus 5 × 0.4 mg i.m. doses) at 3-minute intervals showed that comparable plasma naloxone concentrations would be anticipated.

Conclusions: Concentrated 2 mg intranasal naloxone is well-absorbed and provides early exposure comparable to 0.4 mg intramuscular naloxone, following the 0.4 mg intramuscular curve closely in the first 10 minutes post-dosing and maintaining blood levels above twice the intramuscular reference for the next 2 hours.

Keywords: Antidote; drug overdose; intranasal; naloxone; nasal; opiate; opioids; pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean plasma naloxone concentrations (observed values): dosing to 120 minutes (left) and dosing to 20 minutes (right)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plots of plasma naloxone concentrations over time (left: 120 minutes; right: 20 minutes) for individual subjects after 2 mg intranasal (i.n.) dose
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scaled mean plasma naloxone concentrations after repeat administration at 3‐minute intervals (versus mean observed profiles of 0.4 mg intramuscular (i.m.) and 2 mg intranasal (i.n.) doses)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scaled mean plasma naloxone concentrations after immediate administration of multiple doses at 0 minutes (versus mean observed profile of 4 mg intranasal (i.n.) dose)

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) . World Drug Report. 2016. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/wdr2016/ (accessed 1 December 2016) (Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/6u56T1R41 on 9 October 2017).
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) . Community Management of Opioid Overdose 2014. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/137462/1/9789241548816_eng.pdf?... (accessed 25 January 2016) (Archived at http://www.webcitation.org/6qHBtnGWj on 7 May 2017).
    1. Strang J. Take‐home naloxone: the next steps. Comments on Strang et al.'s ‘Preventing opiate overdose fatalities with take‐home naloxone: pre‐launch study of possible impact and acceptability’. Addiction 1999; 94: 206–207. - PubMed
    1. Doe‐Simkins M., Walley A. Y., Epstein A., Moyer P. Saved by the nose: bystander‐administered intranasal naloxone hydrochloride for opioid overdose. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 788–791. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strang J., McDonald R., Tas B., Day E. Clinical provision of improvised nasal naloxone without experimental testing and without regulatory approval: imaginative shortcut or dangerous bypass of essential safety procedures? Addiction 2016; 111: 574–582. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms