Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Testing: IHC vs. FISH vs. NGS
- PMID: 29143897
- DOI: 10.1007/s11864-017-0513-x
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Testing: IHC vs. FISH vs. NGS
Abstract
Personalized targeted therapy has emerged as a promising strategy in lung cancer treatment, with current attention focused on elucidation and detection of oncogenic drivers responsible for tumor initiation and maintenance and development of drug resistance. In lung cancer, several oncogenic drivers have been reported, triggering the application of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to target these dysfunctional genes. The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is responsible for about 4-7% of all non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and perhaps as high as a third in specific patient populations such as younger, male, non-smokers with advanced stage, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) wild type, and signet ring cell adenocarcinoma with abundant intracytoplasmic mucin. The selection of patients based on their ALK status is vital on account of the high response rates with the ALK-targeted agents in this subset of patients. Standardization and validation of ALK rearrangement detection methods is essential for accurate and reproducible results. There are currently three detection methods widely available in clinical practice, including fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based next generation sequencing (NGS) technology. However, the choice of diagnostic methodology for ALK rearrangement detection in clinical practice remains a matter of debate. With accumulating data enumerating the advantages and disadvantages of each of the three methods, combining more than one testing method for ALK fusion detection may be beneficial for patients. In this review, we will discuss the current methods used in ALK rearrangement detection with emphasis on their key advantages and disadvantages.
Keywords: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH); Immunohistochemistry (IHC); Lung cancer; Next generation sequencing (NGS).
Similar articles
-
On the relevance of a testing algorithm for the detection of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinomas.Lung Cancer. 2014 Feb;83(2):168-73. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 1. Lung Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24380695
-
Assessment of cytology based molecular analysis to guide targeted therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Oncotarget. 2016 Feb 16;7(7):8332-40. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6671. Oncotarget. 2016. PMID: 26789109 Free PMC article.
-
ALK rearrangement in a large series of consecutive non-small cell lung cancers: comparison between a new immunohistochemical approach and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the screening of patients eligible for crizotinib treatment.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Nov;138(11):1449-58. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2013-0388-OA. Epub 2014 Jun 2. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014. PMID: 24885803
-
Somatic mutations and immune checkpoint biomarkers.Respirology. 2019 Mar;24(3):215-226. doi: 10.1111/resp.13463. Epub 2019 Jan 12. Respirology. 2019. PMID: 30636374 Review.
-
Diagnosis of anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement in cytological samples through a fluorescence in situ hybridization-based assay: Cytological smears versus cell blocks.Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 May;125(5):303-312. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21835. Epub 2017 Feb 14. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017. PMID: 28195686 Review.
Cited by
-
Monitoring Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: How Molecular Tools May Drive Therapeutic Approaches.Front Oncol. 2019 Sep 6;9:833. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00833. eCollection 2019. Front Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31555590 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A novel automated IHC staining system for quality control application in ALK immunohistochemistry testing.Pathol Oncol Res. 2025 Feb 13;31:1611964. doi: 10.3389/pore.2025.1611964. eCollection 2025. Pathol Oncol Res. 2025. PMID: 40017673 Free PMC article.
-
Testing for EGFR Mutations and ALK Rearrangements in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Considerations for Countries in Emerging Markets.Onco Targets Ther. 2021 Sep 1;14:4671-4692. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S313669. eCollection 2021. Onco Targets Ther. 2021. PMID: 34511936 Free PMC article. Review.
-
ALK detection in lung cancer: identification of atypical and cryptic ALK rearrangements using an optimal algorithm.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 May;146(5):1307-1320. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03166-1. Epub 2020 Mar 3. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32128622 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Companion Diagnostic Tests by Immunohistochemistry for the Screening of Alectinib-Treated Patients in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 23;12(5):1297. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051297. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35626451 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous