Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Jan;31(1):22-5.

Contrasting response to cyclosporin in refractory nephrotic syndrome

Affiliations
  • PMID: 2914407

Contrasting response to cyclosporin in refractory nephrotic syndrome

R Zietse et al. Clin Nephrol. 1989 Jan.

Abstract

We studied the effects of cyclosporin A (CsA), given for three months, in 14 patients with nephrotic syndrome refractory to treatment with prednisone and/or other immunosuppressants. CsA was given in a starting dose of 6 mg/kg and plasma through levels (RIA) were kept between 50 and 150 ng/ml. Diagnosis included: idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis (n = 6), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (n = 3), minimal change disease (n = 3) and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (n = 2). Three patients with non-immunologically mediated nephrotic syndrome due to Alport's syndrome were studied as well. Considering all patients and diagnostic groups together, proteinuria decreased from 9.0 +/- 4.3 to 4.7 +/- 3.8 g/24 h during CsA treatment (mean +/- SD; p less than 0.01). However, serum creatinine increased from 121.8 +/- 60.5 to 150.4 +/- 64.6 mol/l (p less than 0.01) and glomerular filtration rate as estimated by 24-hour creatinine clearance fell from 85.5 +/- 33.7 to 72.1 +/- 37.2 ml/min (p less than 0.05). When compared to other diagnostic groups, fractional excretion of protein, i.e. protein excretion corrected for changes in glomerular filtration rate, fell only in IMGN (ANOVA, p less than 0.05). We conclude that CsA reduced proteinuria in patients with refractory nephrotic syndrome. In the majority of these patients this reduction could be due to a renal hemodynamic, rather than an immunomodulatory effect of the drug. Only in IMGN the latter action of the drug may be of importance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in