Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0187582.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187582. eCollection 2017.

The influence of computer-based cognitive flexibility training on subjective cognitive well-being after stroke: A multi-center randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The influence of computer-based cognitive flexibility training on subjective cognitive well-being after stroke: A multi-center randomized controlled trial

Renate M van de Ven et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Stroke can result in cognitive complaints that can have a large impact on quality of life long after its occurrence. A number of computer-based training programs have been developed with the aim to improve cognitive functioning. Most studies investigating their efficacy used only objective outcome measures, whereas a reduction of subjective cognitive complaints may be equally important for improving quality of life. A few studies used subjective outcome measures but were inconclusive, partly due to methodological shortcomings such as lack of proper active and passive control groups.

Objective: The aim of the current study was to investigate whether computer-based cognitive flexibility training can improve subjective cognitive functioning and quality of life after stroke.

Methods: We performed a randomized controlled double blind trial (RCT). Adults (30-80 years old) who had a stroke 3 months to 5 years ago, were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (n = 38), an active control group (i.e., mock training; n = 35), or a waiting list control group (n = 24). The intervention and mock training consisted of 58 half-hour sessions within 12 weeks. The primary subjective outcome measures were cognitive functioning (Cognitive Failure Questionnaire), executive functioning (Dysexecutive Functioning Questionnaire), quality of life (Short Form Health Survey), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL; Lawton & Brody IADL scale), and participation in society (Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation). Secondary subjective outcome measures were recovery after stroke, depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale-depression subscale), fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength-Fatigue subscale), and subjective cognitive improvement (exit list). Finally, a proxy of the participant rated the training effects in subjective cognitive functioning, subjective executive functioning, and IADL.

Results and conclusions: All groups improved on the two measures of subjective cognitive functioning and subjective executive functioning, but not on the other measures. These cognitive and executive improvements remained stable 4 weeks after training completion. However, the intervention group did not improve more than the two control groups. This suggests that improvement was due to training-unspecific effects. The proxies did not report any improvements. We, therefore, conclude that the computer-based cognitive flexibility training did not improve subjective cognitive functioning or quality of life after stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram.
T2 = post-training; T3 = 4 weeks after training completion.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Average subjective cognitive improvement in (a) cognitive functioning and (b) executive functioning of both training groups together.
Note. Lower scores represent better performance. Error bars represent standard errors. * = significant improvement (statistical test based on transformed values); CFQ = Cognitive Failure Questionnaire; DEX = Dysexecutive Functioning Questionnaire.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van Rijsbergen MWA, Mark RE, de Kort PLM, Sitskoorn MM. Prevalence and profile of poststroke subjective cognitive complaints. Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2015;24: 1823–1831. - PubMed
    1. Wilz G. Predictors of subjective impairment after stroke: Influence of depression, gender and severity of stroke. Brain Injury. 2007;21: 39–45. doi: 10.1080/02699050601121996 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fride Y, Adamit T, Maeir A, Ben Assayag E, Bornstein NM, Korczyn AD, et al. What are the correlates of cognition and participation to return to work after first ever mild stroke? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2015;22: 317–325. doi: 10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kielbergerova L, Mayer O Jr, Vanek J, Bruthans J, Wohlfahrt P, Cifkova R. Quality of life predictors in chronic stable post-stroke patients and prognostic value of SF-36 score as a mortality surrogate. Transl Stroke Res. 2015;6: 375–383. doi: 10.1007/s12975-015-0418-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Rijsbergen MWA, Mark RE, de Kort PLM, Sitskoorn MM. Subjective cognitive complaints after stroke: A systematic review. Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2014;23: 408–420. - PubMed

Publication types