Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 16;12(11):e0188144.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188144. eCollection 2017.

Adenosine, lidocaine and Mg2+ (ALM) fluid therapy attenuates systemic inflammation, platelet dysfunction and coagulopathy after non-compressible truncal hemorrhage

Affiliations

Adenosine, lidocaine and Mg2+ (ALM) fluid therapy attenuates systemic inflammation, platelet dysfunction and coagulopathy after non-compressible truncal hemorrhage

Hayley Letson et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Systemic inflammation and coagulopathy are major drivers of injury progression following hemorrhagic trauma. Our aim was to examine the effect of small-volume 3% NaCl adenosine, lidocaine and Mg2+ (ALM) bolus and 0.9% NaCl/ALM 'drip' on inflammation and coagulation in a rat model of hemorrhagic shock.

Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats (429±4 g) were randomly assigned to: 1) shams, 2) no-treatment, 3) saline-controls, 4) ALM-therapy, and 5) Hextend®. Hemorrhage was induced in anesthetized-ventilated animals by liver resection (60% left lateral lobe and 50% medial lobe). After 15 min, a bolus of 3% NaCl ± ALM (0.7 ml/kg) was administered intravenously (Phase 1) followed 60 min later by 4 hour infusion of 0.9% NaCl ± ALM (0.5 ml/kg/hour) with 1-hour monitoring (Phase 2). Plasma cytokines were measured on Magpix® and coagulation using Stago/Rotational Thromboelastometry.

Results: After Phase 1, saline-controls, no-treatment and Hextend® groups showed significant falls in white and red cells, hemoglobin and hematocrit (up to 30%), whereas ALM animals had similar values to shams (9-15% losses). After Phase 2, these deficits in non-ALM groups were accompanied by profound systemic inflammation. In contrast, after Phase 1 ALM-treated animals had undetectable plasma levels of IL-1α and IL-1β, and IL-2, IL-6 and TNF-α were below baseline, and after Phase 2 they were less or similar to shams. Non-ALM groups (except shams) also lost their ability to aggregate platelets, had lower plasma fibrinogen levels, and were hypocoagulable. ALM-treated animals had 50-fold higher ADP-induced platelet aggregation, and 9.3-times higher collagen-induced aggregation compared to saline-controls, and had little or no coagulopathy with significantly higher fibrinogen shifting towards baseline. Hextend® had poor outcomes.

Conclusions: Small-volume ALM bolus/drip mounted a frontline defense against non-compressible traumatic hemorrhage by defending immune cell numbers, suppressing systemic inflammation, improving platelet aggregation and correcting coagulopathy. Saline-controls were equivalent to no-treatment. Possible mechanisms of ALM's immune-bolstering effect are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: GPD is the inventor of the ALM concept for organ arrest, protection and preservation (US 20050202394 A1). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Schematic of the in vivo rat model of truncal bleeding and shock treated with two-phase resuscitation therapy.
Animals were anesthetized and mechanically ventilated for the entire experimental and monitoring period (~7 hr 15 min). Body temperature was allowed to drift after anesthesia.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Prothrombin time (sec), activated partial thromboplastin time (sec), and fibrinogen concentration (g/dL) after Phase 1 (A) and Phase 2 (B) resuscitation at baseline, and in shams, no treatment, saline controls, ALM therapy, and Hextend® groups.
Values represent mean ± SEM. Baseline values were obtained from 8 healthy anaesthetized, ventilated rats with one femoral cut-down to obtain an arterial blood sample (see Methods). n = 8 for all groups after Phase 1 resuscitation and Baseline, Sham and ALM groups at Phase 2 resuscitation. n = 2 for Hextend® group, n = 3 for No treatment group, and n = 5 for Saline controls at Phase 2 resuscitation due to early mortality. *p<0.05 compared to Baseline and ALM groups; #p<0.05 compared to Baseline; p<0.05 compared to ALM group; p<0.05 compared to Baseline, Sham, and ALM therapy; p<0.05 compared to all groups except No Treatment group.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Platelet count (109/L) (A) at baseline, after 60 min Phase 1 resuscitation, and 240 min and 300 min Phase 2 resuscitation, and ADP- (B) and collagen-induced (C) maximum platelet aggregation after Phase 2 resuscitation in shams, no-treatment, saline, ALM, and Hextend® groups.
Values represent mean ± SEM. n = 8 for all groups. *p<0.05 compared to Sham and ALM groups; #p<0.05 compared to ALM group.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Temperature (°C) at baseline (Pre-bleed), and during Phase 1 and Phase 2 resuscitation in shams, no-treatment animals, saline controls, ALM therapy group, and Hextend®-treated animals.
Values represent mean ± SEM. All values n = 8 except for groups with mortality. For No-Treatment group n≤7 from 30 min Phase 1; n = 0 from 150 min Phase 2. For Saline controls n≤6 from 45 min Phase 1. For Hextend® group n≤7 from 15 min Phase 1 until 60 min Phase 2; n = 0 from 90 min Phase 2. p<0.05 compared to all other groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stannard A, Morrison JJ, Scott DJ, Ivatury RA, Ross JD, Rasmussen TE. The epidemiology of noncompressible torso hemorrhage in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013. 74(3):830–4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827a3704 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kisat M, Morrison JJ, Hashmi ZG, Efron DT, Rasmussen TE, Haider AH. Epidemiology and outcomes of non-compressible torso hemorrhage. J Surg Res. 2013;184(1):414–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.099 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T, Uribe P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182755dcc - DOI - PubMed
    1. Butler FK, Holcomb JB, Schreiber MA, Kotwal RS, Jenkins DA, Champion HR, et al. Fluid Resuscitation for Hemorrhagic Shock in Tactical Combat Casualty Care: TCCC Guidelines Change 14–01–2 June 2014. J Spec Oper Med 2014;14(3):13–28. - PubMed
    1. Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma. 2006;60(6 (Suppl)):S3–11. - PubMed

MeSH terms