Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;30(1):113-120.
doi: 10.1177/1040638717742434. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

Cephalexin susceptibility breakpoint for veterinary isolates: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute revision

Affiliations

Cephalexin susceptibility breakpoint for veterinary isolates: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute revision

Mark G Papich et al. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) uses cephalothin as the class representative for testing veterinary isolates for susceptibility to other first-generation cephalosporins, including cephalexin. We examined replacing cephalothin with cephalexin because cephalexin is used more often clinically. Bacterial isolates were obtained from dogs and cats from a national surveillance program. CLSI testing methods were used to determine the MIC for 4 cephalosporins used in veterinary medicine. Cephalexin clinical breakpoints for canine isolates were established by using published pharmacokinetic data and Monte Carlo simulations to calculate the probability of target attainment (PTA). For 1,112 Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates, the mode, MIC50, and MIC90 were 1, 2, and 64 µg/mL, respectively, for cephalexin, and ≤0.06, 0.12, and 2 µg/mL for cephalothin. Susceptibility of S. pseudintermedius from 2011 to 2014 did not change for the 4 cephalosporins tested. Only 4.3% of the penicillin-binding protein 2a-positive S. pseudintermedius isolates had MIC values ≤2 µg/mL for cephalexin, but 66.3% of these isolates had MIC values ≤2 µg/mL for cephalothin. There were also discrepancies between cephalexin and cephalothin for other bacteria tested, but the largest difference was for S. pseudintermedius, with a MIC difference of 4 doubling dilutions. Cephalexin interpretive categories (breakpoints) of ≤2 μg/mL (susceptible), 4 μg/mL (intermediate), and ≥8 μg/mL (resistant) were established for isolates obtained from dogs. Cephalothin should not be used for susceptibility testing of cephalexin for veterinary bacterial pathogens, and canine-specific breakpoints should be used for testing susceptibility. Breakpoints determined using the methods described herein for the interpretive categories will be added to future CLSI tables to reflect this recommendation.

Keywords: Breakpoints; CLSI; Staphylococcus pseudintermedius; cephalexin; cephalothin; susceptibility testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: Dr. Papich has previously received honoraria for speaking at conferences, payment for consulting, gifts, and research support from Zoetis. Dr. Papich is the Chairholder of the CLSI-VAST subcommittee, a nonprofit organization in which all members serve as unpaid volunteers. Ms. Lindeman conducted this work while an employee at Zoetis. Zoetis is an animal health pharmaceutical company, but neither cephalexin nor cephalothin, the antibiotics that are the subject of this manuscript, are owned or marketed by Zoetis.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cephalexin and cephalothin Staphylococcus pseudintermedius minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) population distributions plotted with corresponding penicillin-binding protein 2a result (n = 1,112). These results correspond to data in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3. Red dashed lines represent breakpoints for susceptible (≤2 µg/mL) and resistant (≥8 µg/mL).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Angarano DW, MacDonald JM. Efficacy of cefadroxil in the treatment of bacterial dermatitis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989;194:57–59. - PubMed
    1. Bard JD, et al. Rationale for eliminating Staphylococcus breakpoints for β-lactam agents other than penicillin, oxacillin or cefoxitin, and ceftaroline. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:1287–1296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry AL, et al. Reassessment of the “class” concept of disk susceptibility testing: cephalothin disks versus minimal inhibitory concentrations with eleven cephalosporins. Am J Clin Pathol 1978;70:909–913. - PubMed
    1. Campbell BG, Rosin E. Effect of food on absorption of cefadroxl and cephalexin in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1998;21:418–420. - PubMed
    1. Carli S, et al. Absorption kinetics and bioavailability of cephalexin in the dog after oral and intramuscular administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 1999;22:308–313. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources