Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e017639.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017639.

Menopausal hormone therapy and colorectal cancer: a linkage between nationwide registries in Norway

Affiliations

Menopausal hormone therapy and colorectal cancer: a linkage between nationwide registries in Norway

Edoardo Botteri et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: With the present study, we aimed to investigate the association between menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC).

Setting: Cohort study based on the linkage of Norwegian population-based registries.

Participants: We selected 466822 Norwegian women, aged 55-79, alive and residing in Norway as of 1 January 2004, and we followed them from 2004 to 2008. Each woman contributed person-years at risk as non-user, current user and/or past HT user.

Outcome measures: The outcome of interest was adenocarcinoma of the colorectal tract, overall, by anatomic site and stage at diagnosis. Incidence rate ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were estimated by Poisson regression and were used to evaluate the association between HT and CRC incidence.

Results: During the median follow-up of 4.8 years, 138 655 (30%) women received HT and 3799 (0.8%) incident CRCs occurred. Current, but not past, use of HT was associated with a lower risk of CRC (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.98). RRs for localised, regionally advanced and metastatic CRC were 1.13 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.41), 0.81 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.94) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.62 to 1.00), respectively. RRs for current use of oestrogen therapy (ET) were 0.91 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.04) while RR for current use of combined oestrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) was 0.85 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.03), as compared with no use of HT. The same figures for ET and EPT in oral formulations were 0.83 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.03) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.05), respectively.

Conclusions: In our nationwide cohort study, HT use lowered the risk of CRC, specifically the most advanced CRC.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; estrogens; menopausal hormone therapy; progestins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Follow-up of study participants.

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:87–108. 10.3322/caac.21262 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ 2014;348:g2467 10.1136/bmj.g2467 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan AT, Giovannucci EL. Primary prevention of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2010;138:2029–43. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.057 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drew DA, Cao Y, Chan AT. Aspirin and colorectal cancer: the promise of precision chemoprevention. Nat Rev Cancer 2016;16:173–86. 10.1038/nrc.2016.4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin KJ, Cheung WY, Lai JY, et al. . The effect of estrogen vs. combined estrogen-progestogen therapy on the risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2012;130:419–30. 10.1002/ijc.26026 - DOI - PubMed