Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug 31;6(11):e1373237.
doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1373237. eCollection 2017.

Trial watch: Immune checkpoint blockers for cancer therapy

Affiliations
Review

Trial watch: Immune checkpoint blockers for cancer therapy

Claire Vanpouille-Box et al. Oncoimmunology. .

Abstract

Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) are literally revolutionizing the clinical management of an ever more diversified panel of oncological indications. Although considerable attention persists around the inhibition of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1, best known as PD-1) signaling, several other co-inhibitory T-cell receptors are being evaluated as potential targets for the development of novel ICBs. Moreover, substantial efforts are being devoted to the identification of biomarkers that reliably predict the likelihood of each patient to obtain clinical benefits from ICBs in the absence of severe toxicity. Tailoring the delivery of specific ICBs or combinations thereof to selected patient populations in the context of precision medicine programs constitutes indeed a major objective of the future of ICB-based immunotherapy. Here, we discuss recent preclinical and clinical advances on the development of ICBs for oncological indications.

Keywords: Atezolizumab; avelumab; durvalumab; ipilimumab; nivolumab; pembrolizumab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Recently initiated clinical trials testing immune checkpoint blockers in cancer patients. Clinical trials first registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov between 2015, March 1st and 2017, June 30th are classified based on main immunotherapeutic approach or oncological indication. Absolute numbers and percentage are indicated. See also Supplementary Table 1.

References

    1. Nelson AL, Dhimolea E, Reichert JM. Development trends for human monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:767-74. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nrd3229. PMID:20811384 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, Gonzalez R, Robert C, Schadendorf D, Hassel JC, et al.. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:711-23. https://doi.org/ 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466. PMID:20525992 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buque A, Bloy N, Aranda F, Castoldi F, Eggermont A, Cremer I, Fridman WH, Fucikova J, Galon J, Marabelle A, et al.. Trial Watch: Immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies for oncological indications. Oncoimmunology. 2015; 4:e1008814. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1008814. PMID:26137403 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galluzzi L, Eggermont A, Kroemer G. Doubling the blockade for melanoma immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2016; 5:e1106127. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1106127. PMID:26942094 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mellman I, Coukos G, Dranoff G. Cancer immunotherapy comes of age. Nature. 2011; 480:480-9. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature10673. PMID:22193102 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types