Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. II. Dependence on stimulus variables
- PMID: 2914807
- DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90033-6
Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. II. Dependence on stimulus variables
Abstract
The suppression by moderate-level contralateral sound of auditory-nerve-fiber responses to ipsilateral stimuli at the characteristic frequency (CF) was studied in barbiturate-anesthetized cats. The dependence of suppression strength on ipsilateral and contralateral stimulus variables, including level, frequency, bandwidth, and timing relationships, was investigated. The principal findings were: (1) Contralateral-sound suppression is greatest when the ipsilateral stimulus level is within the dynamic range of the unit. (2) When the contralateral stimuli are tones, suppression is greatest when the contralateral tone frequency is at or near CF. (3) Units with CFs above 3-4 kHz are only weakly suppressed by contralateral CF tones but more strongly suppressed by contralateral broad-band noise. (4) Continuous contralateral stimuli are significantly more effective suppressors than are gated stimuli. The characteristics of contralateral-sound suppression are compared with the physiology and anatomy of the uncrossed medial olivocochlear efferents, the subset of efferents which are the primary mediators of the effect.
Similar articles
-
Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. I. Contributions of cochlear efferents.Hear Res. 1989 Jan;37(2):89-104. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90032-4. Hear Res. 1989. PMID: 2914811
-
Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF.Hear Res. 1988 Dec;37(1):29-45. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90075-5. Hear Res. 1988. PMID: 3225230
-
Response properties of cochlear efferent neurons: monaural vs. binaural stimulation and the effects of noise.J Neurophysiol. 1988 Nov;60(5):1779-98. doi: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.5.1779. J Neurophysiol. 1988. PMID: 3199181
-
Medial efferent effects on auditory-nerve responses to tail-frequency tones. I. Rate reduction.J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Aug;106(2):857-69. doi: 10.1121/1.427102. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999. PMID: 10462791
-
Quantifying 2-factor phase relations in non-linear responses from low characteristic-frequency auditory-nerve fibers.Hear Res. 1995 Oct;90(1-2):126-38. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00154-7. Hear Res. 1995. PMID: 8974990 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term evolution of brainstem electrical evoked responses to sound after restricted ablation of the auditory cortex.PLoS One. 2013 Sep 16;8(9):e73585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073585. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24066057 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot.J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Oct;140(4):2481. doi: 10.1121/1.4964267. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016. PMID: 27794300 Free PMC article.
-
Accounting for nonmonotonic precursor duration effects with gain reduction in the temporal window model.J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Mar;135(3):1321-34. doi: 10.1121/1.4864783. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014. PMID: 24606271 Free PMC article.
-
Ventral cochlear nucleus responses to contralateral sound are mediated by commissural and olivocochlear pathways.J Neurophysiol. 2009 Aug;102(2):886-900. doi: 10.1152/jn.91003.2008. Epub 2009 May 20. J Neurophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19458143 Free PMC article.
-
Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.Hear Res. 2010 Aug;267(1-2):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 Apr 27. Hear Res. 2010. PMID: 20430088 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous