Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 17;18(11):2446.
doi: 10.3390/ijms18112446.

Molecular Alliance of Lymantria dispar Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus and a Short Unmodified Antisense Oligonucleotide of Its Anti-Apoptotic IAP-3 Gene: A Novel Approach for Gypsy Moth Control

Affiliations

Molecular Alliance of Lymantria dispar Multiple Nucleopolyhedrovirus and a Short Unmodified Antisense Oligonucleotide of Its Anti-Apoptotic IAP-3 Gene: A Novel Approach for Gypsy Moth Control

Volodymyr V Oberemok et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Baculovirus IAP (inhibitor-of-apoptosis) genes originated by capture of host genes. Unmodified short antisense DNA oligonucleotides (oligoDNAs) from baculovirus IAP genes can down-regulate specific gene expression profiles in both baculovirus-free and baculovirus-infected insects. In this study, gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) larvae infected with multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus (LdMNPV), and LdMNPV-free larvae, were treated with oligoDNA antisense to the RING (really interesting new gene) domain of the LdMNPV IAP-3 gene. The results with respect to insect mortality, biomass accumulation, histological studies, RT-PCR, and analysis of DNA apoptotic fragmentation suggest that oligoRING induced increased apoptotic processes in both LdMNPV-free and LdMNPV-infected insect cells, but were more pronounced in the latter. These data open up possibilities for promising new routes of insect pest control using antisense phosphodiester DNA oligonucleotides.

Keywords: DNA insecticides; RING (really interesting new gene); baculovirus infection; gypsy moth Lymantria dispar; insect pest management; multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus IAP (inhibitor-of-apoptosis) genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Alignment of the sequenced DNA fragments of gypsy moth and nucleopolyhedrovirus (LdMNPV) IAP-3 gene fragments performed using ClustalW 2.0.3; identities found by simple comparison of the sequences are marked with *.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expression of gypsy moth IAP-Z and IAP-1 genes after treatment with oligoDNAs. (a) Treatment of LdMNPV-free larvae with oligoRING (RING column) leads to significant down-regulation of host IAP-Z gene expression on the 14th day. Values represent means and standard errors of mRNA expression for 3 replicates relative to the water-treated control group. The significant difference between the oligoRING group and the water-treated control group is indicated by * when p < 0.05; (b) Treatment of LdMNPV-free gypsy moth larvae with oligoRING (RING column) leads to markedly decreased expression of the host IAP-1 gene on the 14th day. Values represent means and standard errors of mRNA expression for 3 replicates relative to the control water-treated control group. The significant difference between the oligoRING group and the water-treated control group is indicated by ^ when p < 0.12.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Light microscopy of the gypsy moth larvae histological slides. (a) Control sample (water-treated control): 1—outer layers; 2—intestinal epithelium; 3—esophagus; 4—pigment cells and their septum; 5—mandible; 6—maxilla; (b) OligoRING-treated larvae showing pronounced apoptotic destruction of tissues: 1—outer layers; 2—pigment cells with destroyed septum; 3—separate clusters of epithelial cells of the digestive tube; 4—destroyed mouth apparatus; 5—heart; 6—anal section of the digestive tube; 7—normal cell; 8—apoptotic signatures (pyknosis, karyorrhexis, and involution of cells); 9—vacuolated cell. Magnification: ×40 for (a), (b) and ×80 for the zoomed fragment of (b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The oligoRING’s effect on the mortality and biomass accumulation of LdMNPV-infected gypsy moth larvae. (a) Non-cumulative curve of mortality of LdMNPV-infected larvae after treatment with oligoDNAs. The significant difference is indicated by * for p < 0.05. Each group (water-treated control, oligoCpG, and oligoRING) used 20 to 25 larvae per replicate. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate; (b) The mean body mass of LdMNPV-infected larvae after treatment with water, oligoCpG, or oligoRING is shown in mg. SE (standard errors) are given for three replicates. Significant difference: ** for p < 0.01; *** for p < 0.001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Expression of gypsy moth IAP-1 gene and joint expression of baculovirus IAP-3 and host IAP-Z genes after treatment with oligoDNAs. (a) Treatment of LdMNPV-infected larvae with oligoRING leads to significant down-regulation of total expression of hIAP-Z and vIAP-3 genes on the 6th day. Values represent means and standard errors of mRNA expression for 3 replicates relative to the water-treated control group. The significant difference between oligoRING group vs. water control is indicated by ** when p < 0.01; (b) Treatment of LdMNPV-infected gypsy moth larvae with the oligoRING leads to a significant decrease in expression of the host IAP-1 gene on the 14th day. Values represent means and standard errors of mRNA expression for 3 replicates relative to the water-treated control group. The significant difference between oligoRING group vs. the water-treated control group is indicated by *** when p < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Electrophoretic separation of DNA extracted from tissues of live LdMNPV-infected gypsy moth larvae (1% agarose gels). The positions of DNA markers are indicated on the left. Lanes: 1,2—water control; 3,4—oligoCpG treatment; 5,6—oligoRING treatment. Signs: FD—apoptotic fragmented DNA (around 180 and 360 bp); HF—higher fraction of undergraded genomic DNA. Data in each agarose lane represent DNA from three live larvae from every group in the experiment.

References

    1. Gu L., Knipple D.C. Recent advances in RNA interference research in insects: Implications for future insect pest management strategies. Crop. Protect. 2013;45:36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.004. - DOI
    1. Zotti M.J., Smagghe G. RNAi technology for insect management and protection of beneficial insects from diseases: Lessons, challenges and risk assessments. Neotrop. Entomol. 2015;44:197–213. doi: 10.1007/s13744-015-0291-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terenius O., Papanicolaou A., Garbutt J.S., Eleftherianos I., Huvenne H., Kanginakudru S., Albrechtsen M., An C., Aymeric J.L., Barthel A., et al. RNA interference in Lepidoptera: An overview of successful and unsuccessful studies and implications for experimental design. J. Insect Physiol. 2011;57:231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.11.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lundgren J.G., Duan J.J. RNAi-based insecticidal crops: Potential effects on nontargetspecies. Bioscience. 2013;63:657–665. doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.8.8. - DOI
    1. Oberemok V.V. Method of elimination of phyllophagousinsects from order Lepidoptera. 36445. UA Patent. 2008 May 19;

Substances

Supplementary concepts