Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Injury
- PMID: 29150426
- PMCID: PMC5882250
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031806
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Injury
Abstract
Background: Type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury are common in clinical practice, but long-term consequences are uncertain. We aimed to define long-term outcomes and explore risk stratification in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury.
Methods: We identified consecutive patients (n=2122) with elevated cardiac troponin I concentrations (≥0.05 µg/L) at a tertiary cardiac center. All diagnoses were adjudicated as per the universal definition of myocardial infarction. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (eg, nonfatal myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death) and noncardiovascular death. To explore competing risks, cause-specific hazard ratios were obtained using Cox regression models.
Results: The adjudicated index diagnosis was type 1 or 2 myocardial infarction or myocardial injury in 1171 (55.2%), 429 (20.2%), and 522 (24.6%) patients, respectively. At 5 years, all-cause death rates were higher in those with type 2 myocardial infarction (62.5%) or myocardial injury (72.4%) compared with type 1 myocardial infarction (36.7%). The majority of excess deaths in those with type 2 myocardial infarction or myocardial injury were because of noncardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.92-2.81 versus type 1 myocardial infarction). Despite this finding, the observed crude major adverse cardiovascular event rates were similar between groups (30.6% versus 32.6%), with differences apparent after adjustment for covariates (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.96). Coronary heart disease was an independent predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events in those with type 2 myocardial infarction or myocardial injury (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.24).
Conclusions: Despite an excess in noncardiovascular death, patients with type 2 myocardial infarction or myocardial injury have a similar crude rate of major adverse cardiovascular events as those with type 1 myocardial infarction. Identifying underlying coronary heart disease in this vulnerable population may help target therapies that could modify future risk.
Keywords: myocardial injury; troponin; type 2 myocardial infarction.
© 2017 The Authors.
Figures
Comment in
-
Response To Letter Regarding Article "Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Injury".Circulation. 2018 Sep 11;138(11):1178. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036021. Epub 2018 Sep 10. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 30287969 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Letter by Madias Regarding Article, "Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Injury".Circulation. 2018 Sep 11;138(11):1176-1177. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035681. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 30354390 No abstract available.
References
-
- White HD, Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS. Clinical implications of the third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Heart. 2014;100:424–432. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302976. - PubMed
-
- Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Chaitman BA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasché P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2551–2567. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184. - PubMed
-
- Alpert JS, Thygesen KA. The case for a revised definition of myocardial infarction: the ongoing conundrum of type 2 myocardial infarction vs myocardial injury. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1:249–250. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0543. - PubMed
-
- Shah AS, McAllister DA, Mills R, Lee KK, Churchhouse AM, Fleming KM, Layden E, Anand A, Fersia O, Joshi NV, Walker S, Jaffe AS, Fox KA, Newby DE, Mills NL. Sensitive troponin assay and the classification of myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2015;128:493.e3–501.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.10.056. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Javed U, Aftab W, Ambrose JA, Wessel RJ, Mouanoutoua M, Huang G, Barua RS, Weilert M, Sy F, Thatai D. Frequency of elevated troponin I and diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:9–13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.003. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- FS/16/14/32023/BHF_/British Heart Foundation/United Kingdom
- SP/12/10/29922 /BHF_/British Heart Foundation/United Kingdom
- 201492/Z/16/Z/WT_/Wellcome Trust/United Kingdom
- SP/12/10/29922/BHF_/British Heart Foundation/United Kingdom
- 201492-Z-16-Z/WT_/Wellcome Trust/United Kingdom
- PG/15/51/31596/BHF_/British Heart Foundation/United Kingdom
- FS/18/25/33454/BHF_/British Heart Foundation/United Kingdom
- 103782/WT_/Wellcome Trust/United Kingdom
- CH/09/002/26360/BHF_/British Heart Foundation/United Kingdom
- CH/09/002/BHF_/British Heart Foundation/United Kingdom
- FS/16/75/32533/BHF_/British Heart Foundation/United Kingdom
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
