Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep 30:11:1126-1132.
doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011126. eCollection 2017.

Shoulder Arthroplasty Imaging: What's New

Affiliations
Review

Shoulder Arthroplasty Imaging: What's New

T M Gregory et al. Open Orthop J. .

Abstract

Background: Shoulder arthroplasty, in its different forms (hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty) has transformed the clinical outcomes of shoulder disorders. Improvement of general clinical outcome is the result of stronger adequacy of the treatment to the diagnosis, enhanced surgical techniques, specific implanted materials, and more accurate follow up. Imaging is an important tool in each step of these processes.

Method: This article is a review article declining recent imaging processes for shoulder arthroplasty.

Results: Shoulder imaging is important for shoulder arthroplasty pre-operative planning but also for post-operative monitoring of the prosthesis and this article has a focus on the validity of plain radiographs for detecting radiolucent line and on new Computed Tomography scan method established to eliminate the prosthesis metallic artefacts that obscure the component fixation visualisation.

Conclusion: Number of shoulder arthroplasties implanted have grown up rapidly for the past decade, leading to an increase in the number of complications. In parallel, new imaging system have been established to monitor these complications, especially component loosening.

Keywords: Aseptic loosening; CT-scan; Patient specific instrument; Planning; Radiolucent line; Shoulder prosthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wall B., Nové-Josserand L., O’Connor D.P., Edwards T.B., Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007;89(7):1476–1485. - PubMed
    1. Kim S.H., Wise B.L., Zhang Y., Szabo R.M. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2011;93(24):2249–2254. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01994. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boileau P., Winter M., Cikes A., Han Y., Carles M., Walch G., Schwartz D.G. Can surgeons predict what makes a good hemiarthroplasty for fracture? J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(11):1495–1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gregory T.M., Vandenbussche E., Augereau B. Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2013;99(1) Suppl.:S197–S207. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moineau G., Levigne C., Boileau P., Young A., Walch G. Three-dimensional measurement method of arthritic glenoid cavity morphology: feasibility and reproductibility. J. Orthop & Trauma: Surg & Res. 2012;98S:S139–S145. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources