Randomized controlled trials: significant results-fragile, though
- PMID: 29153136
- DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.021
Randomized controlled trials: significant results-fragile, though
Abstract
In their systematic review, Shochet et al. question the robustness of the statistical significance of the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in nephrology reported in high-impact journals (2005-2014). They hypothesized that a high proportion of RCTs in nephrology would be fragile. They calculated a Fragility Index that is a tool for testing robustness of RCTs, based on 107 RCT reports. The observation of an alarming median Fragility Index equal to 3 suggests that in half of the trials, the sole additional occurrence of 3 events would compromise the significance of nominally significant results.
Copyright © 2017 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment on
-
The fragility of significant results underscores the need of larger randomized controlled trials in nephrology.Kidney Int. 2017 Dec;92(6):1469-1475. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 26. Kidney Int. 2017. PMID: 28754551
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources