Morning administration of 0.4U/kg/day insulin glargine 300U/mL provides less fluctuating 24-hour pharmacodynamics and more even pharmacokinetic profiles compared with insulin degludec 100U/mL in type 1 diabetes
- PMID: 29153485
- DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.10.001
Morning administration of 0.4U/kg/day insulin glargine 300U/mL provides less fluctuating 24-hour pharmacodynamics and more even pharmacokinetic profiles compared with insulin degludec 100U/mL in type 1 diabetes
Abstract
Aim: To compare steady state pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of insulin glargine 300U/mL (Gla-300) with insulin degludec 100U/mL (Deg-100) in people with type 1 diabetes.
Methods: This single-centre, randomized, double-blind crossover euglycaemic clamp study included two parallel cohorts with fixed once-daily morning dose regimens. For both insulins participants received 0.4 (n=24) or 0.6U/kg/day (n=24), before breakfast, for 8 days prior to the clamp. The main endpoint was within-day variability (fluctuation) of the smoothed glucose infusion rate (GIR) over 24 hours (GIR-smFL0-24).
Results: Gla-300 provided 20% less fluctuation of steady state glucose infusion rate profiles than Deg-100 over 24 hours at 0.4U/kg/day (GIR-smFL0-24 treatment ratio 0.80 [90% confidence interval: 0.66 to 0.96], P=0.047), while at the dose of 0.6U/kg/day the difference between insulins was not statistically significant (treatment ratio 0.96 [0.83 to 1.11], P=0.603). Serum insulin concentrations appeared more evenly distributed with both dose levels of Gla-300 versus the same doses of Deg-100, as assessed by relative 6-hour fractions of the area under the curve within 24 hours. Both insulins provided exposure and activity until 30 hours (end of clamp).
Conclusion: Gla-300 provides less fluctuating steady state pharmacodynamic profiles (i.e. lower within-day variability) and more evenly distributed pharmacokinetic profiles, compared with Deg-100 in a once-daily morning dosing regimen of 0.4U/kg/day.
Keywords: Insulin degludec; Insulin glargine; Pharmacodynamic; Pharmacokinetic; Type 1 diabetes.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Pharmacological variability of insulins degludec and glargine 300U/mL: Equivalent or not?Diabetes Metab. 2018 Feb;44(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 14. Diabetes Metab. 2018. PMID: 29196025 No abstract available.
-
Variability of insulin degludec and glargine 300 U/mL: A matter of methodology or just marketing?Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2051-2056. doi: 10.1111/dom.13365. Epub 2018 Jun 10. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018. PMID: 29770552 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin degludec and insulin glargine.Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015;11(8):1193-201. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2015.1058779. Epub 2015 Jun 18. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015. PMID: 26086190 Clinical Trial.
-
Day-to-Day and Within-Day Variability in Glucose-Lowering Effect Between Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine (100 U/mL and 300 U/mL): A Comparison Across Studies.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Mar;12(2):356-363. doi: 10.1177/1932296817731422. Epub 2017 Sep 26. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018. PMID: 28946756 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical relevance of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin degludec (100, 200 U/mL) and insulin glargine (100, 300 U/mL) - a review of evidence and clinical interpretation.Diabetes Metab. 2019 Sep;45(4):330-340. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 26. Diabetes Metab. 2019. PMID: 30496834 Review.
-
Single-dose new insulin glargine 300 U/ml provides prolonged, stable glycaemic control in Japanese and European people with type 1 diabetes.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Mar;17(3):254-60. doi: 10.1111/dom.12415. Epub 2014 Dec 22. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015. PMID: 25425297 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Understanding how pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences of basal analog insulins influence clinical practice.Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Oct;33(10):1821-1831. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1335192. Epub 2017 Jun 23. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017. PMID: 28537449 Review.
Cited by
-
Glycemic Variability and Time in Range During Self-titration of Once Daily Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml Versus Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin in Insulin-naïve Chinese Type 2 Diabetes Patients.Diabetes Ther. 2021 May;12(5):1399-1413. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01046-6. Epub 2021 Mar 18. Diabetes Ther. 2021. PMID: 33738774 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Considerations When Initiating and Titrating Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide (IDegLira) in People with Type 2 Diabetes.Drugs. 2020 Feb;80(2):147-165. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01245-3. Drugs. 2020. PMID: 31960258 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U300 in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, head-to-head CONCLUDE trial.Diabetologia. 2020 Apr;63(4):698-710. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05080-9. Epub 2020 Jan 27. Diabetologia. 2020. PMID: 31984443 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Use of Second-Generation Basal Insulin Gla-300 in Special Populations: A Narrative Mini-Review.Curr Diabetes Rev. 2023;19(9):e090123212447. doi: 10.2174/1573399819666230109113205. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2023. PMID: 36624651 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of Switching from Degludec to Glargine U300 in Patients with Insulin-Dependent Type 1 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 8;60(3):450. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030450. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38541176 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical