Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;148(1):97-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

Prognostic value of pre-treatment human papilloma virus DNA status in cervical cancer

Affiliations

Prognostic value of pre-treatment human papilloma virus DNA status in cervical cancer

Gun Oh Chong et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Although the relationship between human papilloma virus (HPV) and cervical cancer is well established, the prognostic value of HPV status has not been determined, largely because previous studies have yielded conflicting results. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of pre-treatment HPV DNA for predicting tumor recurrence in cervical cancer.

Methods: The study included 248 eligible patients who provided cervical cell specimens for HPV genotyping before surgery or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Of these 248 patients, 108 were treated with radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer, and 140 were treated with CCRT for FIGO stage IB2-IV cervical cancer.

Results: HPV 16 and 18 were the two most common HPV types detected, with prevalence rates of 52.4% and 12.5%, respectively. The pre-treatment HPV DNA test showed that 18.5% of cervical cancers were HPV negative. Multivariate analysis showed that HPV negativity was associated with poorer disease-free survival (DFS) than HPV-positive status (hazard ratio [HR], 3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.84-8.58; p=0.0005), and patients with HPV 16-positive cancers had better DFS (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.72; p=0.0019). In the surgery group, only HPV 16 positivity was significantly correlated with DFS (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.96; p=0.0416). In the CCRT group, only HPV negativity was significantly correlated with DFS (HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.78-7.90; p=0.0005).

Conclusions: Pre-treatment HPV DNA status may be a useful prognostic biomarker in cervical cancer. The presence of HPV 16 DNA was associated with better DFS, and HPV negativity was associated with worse DFS. However, larger sample sizes and more comprehensive studies are required to verify our findings.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; HPV DNA; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms