Outpatient elective posterior lumbar fusions appear to be safely considered for appropriately selected patients
- PMID: 29155341
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.11.011
Outpatient elective posterior lumbar fusions appear to be safely considered for appropriately selected patients
Abstract
Background context: There has been growing interest in performing posterior lumbar fusions (PLFs) in the outpatient setting to optimize patient satisfaction and reduce cost. Although still done in only a small percentage of cases, this has been more possible because of advances in surgical techniques and anesthesia. However, data on the perioperative course of outpatient compared with inpatient PLF in a large sample size are scarce.
Purpose: This study aimed to compare perioperative complications between outpatient and inpatient PLF in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
Study design/setting: A retrospective cohort comparison study was carried out.
Patient sample: Patients undergoing PLF with or without interbody fusion from the 2005 to 2015 NSQIP database comprised the sample.
Outcome measures: Outcome measures were postoperative complications within 30 days and readmission within 30 days.
Methods: Patients who underwent PLF with or without interbody fusion were identified in the 2005-2015 NSQIP database. Outpatient procedures were defined as cases that had hospital length of stay (LOS)=0 days, whereas inpatient procedures were defined as LOS=1-30 days. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and procedural variables (inclusion of interbody fusion, instrumentation, and number of levels fused) were compared between the two cohorts. Propensity score-matched comparisons were then performed for postoperative complications and 30-day readmissions between the two groups.
Results: The current study included 360 outpatient and 36,610 inpatient PLF cases. After propensity matching to control potential confounding factors, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in postoperative adverse events other than significantly lower blood transfusions in the outpatient group (2.78% vs. 10.83%, p<.001). Notably, the rate of readmissions was not different between the groups.
Conclusions: Based on the lack of differences in rates of most perioperative complications and 30-day readmissions between the outpatient and inpatient cohorts, it seems that outpatient PLF may be appropriately considered for select patients. However, extremely careful patient selection should be exercised.
Keywords: Complications; NSQIP; Outpatient; Posterior lumbar fusion; Readmissions; Same-day discharge.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Outpatient and Inpatient Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Procedures Have Similar Short-Term Complication Profiles.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):2935-2940. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 18. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28602533
-
Comparison of Outpatient vs Inpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1773-1778. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.043. Epub 2017 Feb 1. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28237215
-
Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.Spine J. 2017 Jul;17(7):922-932. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 27. Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28254672
-
Comparison of the Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Lumbar Fusion : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Feb 15;49(4):269-277. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004838. Epub 2023 Sep 28. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024. PMID: 37767789
-
Outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and adverse events.Int Orthop. 2025 Jan;49(1):151-165. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06364-5. Epub 2024 Nov 5. Int Orthop. 2025. PMID: 39499293 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation of Patient Reported Satisfaction With Adverse Events Following Elective Posterior Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Single Institution Analysis.N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Aug 13;12:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100160. eCollection 2022 Dec. N Am Spine Soc J. 2022. PMID: 36118954 Free PMC article.
-
Thirty-Day Outcomes From Standalone Minimally Invasive Surgery-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Patients in an Ambulatory Surgery Center vs. Hospital Setting.Cureus. 2020 Sep 2;12(9):e10197. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10197. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 33033675 Free PMC article.
-
Complication avoidance and management in ambulatory spine surgery.J Spine Surg. 2019 Sep;5(Suppl 2):S181-S190. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.08.06. J Spine Surg. 2019. PMID: 31656873 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center and Traditional Hospital Settings, Part 2: Assessment of Surgical Safety in Medicare Beneficiaries.J Pers Med. 2023 Mar 22;13(3):566. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030566. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 36983747 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective same day discharge instrumented lumbar spine surgery - a forty patient consecutive series.Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3452-3456. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08365-9. Epub 2024 Jun 25. Eur Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38918227
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical