Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct 25;6(1):160.
doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0366-3.

Zooprophylaxis as a control strategy for malaria caused by the vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae): a systematic review

Affiliations

Zooprophylaxis as a control strategy for malaria caused by the vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae): a systematic review

Abebe Asale et al. Infect Dis Poverty. .

Abstract

Background: Zooprophylaxis is the use of wild or domestic animals, which are not the reservoir host of a given disease, to divert the blood-seeking malaria vectors from human hosts. In this paper, we systematically reviewed zooprophylaxis to assess its efficacy as a malaria control strategy and to evaluate the possible methods of its application.

Methods: The electronic databases, PubMed Central®, Web of Science, Science direct, and African Journals Online were searched using the key terms: "zooprophylaxis" or "cattle and malaria", and reports published between January 1995 and March 2016 were considered. Thirty-four reports on zooprophylaxis were retained for the systematic review.

Results: It was determined that Anopheles arabiensis is an opportunistic feeder. It has a strong preference for cattle odour when compared to human odour, but feeds on both hosts. Its feeding behaviour depends on the available hosts, varying from endophilic and endophagic to exophilic and exophagic. There are three essential factors for zooprophylaxis to be effective in practice: a zoophilic and exophilic vector, habitat separation between human and host animal quarters, and augmenting zooprophylaxis with insecticide treatment of animals or co-intervention of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets and/or indoor residual spraying. Passive zooprophylaxis can be applied only in malaria vector control if cattle and human dwellings are separated in order to avoid the problem of zoopotentiation.

Conclusions: The outcomes of using zooprophylaxis as a malaria control strategy varied across locations. It is therefore advised to conduct a site-specific evaluation of its effectiveness in vector control before implementing zooprophylaxis as the behaviour of Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes varies across localities and circumstances.

Keywords: Cattle; Ethiopia; Malaria; Mosquito; Vector control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Systematic article selection

References

    1. World Health Organization. World health report 2016. 2016; http://who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2016/report/en/. Accessed 11 Apr 2017.
    1. World Health Organization. World health report 2015. 2015; http://who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2015/report/en/. Accessed 24 Dec 2015.
    1. Cox FEG. History of the discovery of the malaria parasites and their vectors. Parasite Vectors. 2010;3:5. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-3-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox-Singh J. Zoonotic malaria: Plasmodium knowlesi, an emerging pathogen. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25:530–536. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283558780. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rich SM, Xu G. Resolving the phylogeny of malaria parasites. Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:12973–12974. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110141108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types