Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;34(3):263-272.
doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2017.67122. Epub 2017 Apr 5.

Evaluation of different jumping tests in defining position-specific and performance-level differences in high level basketball players

Affiliations

Evaluation of different jumping tests in defining position-specific and performance-level differences in high level basketball players

Miran Pehar et al. Biol Sport. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

The importance of jumping ability in basketball is well known, but there is an evident lack of studies that have examined different jumping testing protocols in basketball players at advanced levels. The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of different tests of jumping capacity in identifying differences between (i) playing position and (ii) competitive levels of professional players. Participants were 110 male professional basketball players (height: 194.92±8.09 cm; body mass: 89.33±10.91 kg; 21.58±3.92 years of age; Guards, 49; Forwards, 22; Centres, 39) who competed in the first (n = 58) and second division (n = 52). The variables included anthropometrics and jumping test performance. Jumping performances were evaluated by the standing broad jump (SBJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), reactive strength index (RSI), repeated reactive strength ability (RRSA) and four running vertical jumps: maximal jump with (i) take-off from the dominant leg and (ii) non-dominant leg, lay-up shot jump with take-off from the (iii) dominant leg and (iv) non-dominant leg. First-division players were taller (ES: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.35-1.16, moderate differences), heavier (0.69, 0.29-1.10), had higher maximal reach height (0.67, 0.26-1.07, moderate differences), and had lower body fat % (-0.87, -1.27-0.45, moderate differences) than second-division players. The playing positions differed significantly in three of four running jump achievements, RSI and RRSA, with Centres being least successful. The first-division players were superior to second-division players in SBJ (0.63, 0.23-1.03; 0.87, 0.26-1.43; 0.76, 0.11-1.63, all moderate differences, for total sample, Guards, and Forwards, respectively). Running vertical jumps and repeated jumping capacity can be used as valid measures of position-specific jumping ability in basketball. The differences between playing levels in vertical jumping achievement can be observed by assessing vertical jump scores together with differences in anthropometric indices between levels.

Keywords: Differences; Performance; Reliability; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ostojic SM, Mazic S, Dikic N. Profiling in basketball: physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20:740–4. - PubMed
    1. Karpowicz K, Karpowicz M, Strzelczyk R. Structure of Physical Fitness Among Young Female Basketball Players (Trends of Changes in 2006-2013) J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:2745–57. - PubMed
    1. Conte D, Favero TG, Lupo C, Francioni FM, Capranica L, Tessitore A. Time-motion analysis of Italian elite women’s basketball games: individual and team analyses. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:144–50. - PubMed
    1. Mokou E, Nikolaidis PT, Padulo J, Apostolidis N. The acute effect of exercise intensity on free throws in young basketball players. Sport Sciences for Health. 2016;12:227–32.
    1. Sekulic D, Pehar M, Krolo A, Spasic M, Uljevic O, Calleja-Gonzalez J, Sattler T. Evaluation of basketball-specific agility; applicability of pre-planned and non-planned agility performances for differentiating playing positions and playing levels. J Strength Cond Res. 2016 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources