Assessment of chronic pain and access to pain therapy: a cross-sectional population-based study
- PMID: 29158689
- PMCID: PMC5683774
- DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S136292
Assessment of chronic pain and access to pain therapy: a cross-sectional population-based study
Abstract
Background: Chronic pain (CP) has been shown as an important public health problem, and several studies emphasize the need to strengthen the health care and social systems to reduce its marginalization. This study aimed to: evaluate the epidemiology of CP in the general population in an Italian area; and assess the awareness of a specific law, unanimously approved in Parliament, which provides citizens the right to access pain management (Italian Law 38/2010).
Methods: A cross-sectional population-based study carried out during the spring of 2014 at Narni, Umbria, Italy. All the citizens residing in that area, aged >18, were enrolled in the study. Outcome measures were: prevalence of CP and therapies. The awareness of the Italian Law 38/2010 was also recorded.
Results: Data of 1293 questionnaires were analyzed. The prevalence of CP was 28.4%. In 51.5% of cases, pain was severe, with higher prevalence in females (p<0.001). Moreover, pain was generally increasing with age (p<0.001). The risk of suffering from severe pain was modeled using logistic regression. Significant predictors were female gender (OR 2.59; 95% CI: 1.77-3.79), living in an urban area (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.45-0.88), and age (OR 1.06; 95% CI: 1.04-1.08). Among people with CP, 77.9% were receiving therapy; the proportion of individuals in therapy for severe pain significantly increased with age (OR 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05) and was smaller in individuals with light pain (OR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.66). The majority of subjects (61.9%) are not aware of the existence of a specific law stating their rights to receive pain management.
Conclusion: CP, at least in the rural part of the community investigated in Italy, is not perceived as a chronic disease in its own right. A socio-cultural transformation in patients and in the health care system seems necessary.
Keywords: chronic pain; cross-sectional study; pain control; pain therapy; palliative care.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
References
-
- Niv D, Devor M. Chronic pain as a disease in its own right. Pain Pract. 2004;4(3):179–181. - PubMed
-
- Assessing national capacity for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases: REPORT OF THE 2010 global SURVEY. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. [Accessed March 07, 2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd_report_full_en.pdf.
-
- Bates MS, Rankin-Hill L. Control, culture and chronic pain. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39(5):629–645. - PubMed
-
- Bauer UE, Briss PA, Goodman RA, Bowman BA. Prevention of chronic disease in the 21st century: elimination of the leading preventable causes of premature death and disability in the USA. Lancet. 2014;384(9937):45–52. - PubMed
-
- Breivik H, Collet B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey on chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
