Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;108(1):73-76.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304105. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

Evaluating Public Health Interventions: 7. Let the Subject Matter Choose the Effect Measure: Ratio, Difference, or Something Else Entirely

Affiliations

Evaluating Public Health Interventions: 7. Let the Subject Matter Choose the Effect Measure: Ratio, Difference, or Something Else Entirely

Donna Spiegelman et al. Am J Public Health. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

We define measures of effect used in public health evaluations, which include the risk difference and the risk ratio, the population-attributable risk, years of life lost or gained, disability-adjusted life years, quality-adjusted life years, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Except for the risk ratio, all of these are absolute effect measures. For constructing externally generalizable absolute measures of effect when there is superior fit of the multiplicative model, we suggest using the multiplicative model to estimate relative risks, which will often be obtained in simple linear form with no interactions, and then converting these to the desired absolute measure. The externally generalizable absolute measure of effect can be obtained by suitably standardizing to the risk factor distribution of the population to which the results are to be generalized. External generalizability will often be compromised when absolute measures are computed from study populations with risk factor distributions different from those of the population to whom the results are to be generalized, even when these risk factors are not confounders of the intervention effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Spiegelman D, VanderWeele TJ. Evaluating public health interventions: 6. Modeling ratios or differences? Let the data tell us. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(7):1087–1091. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poole C. On the origin of risk relativism. Epidemiology. 2010;21(1):3–9. - PubMed
    1. Cornfield J, Haenszel W, Hammond EC, Lilienfeld AM, Shimkin MB, Wynder EL. Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22(1):173–203. - PubMed
    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.
    1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Walker A. Concepts of interaction. Am J Epidemiol. 1980;112(4):467–470. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources