Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;22(45):16-00807.
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.45.16-00807.

Surveillance and laboratory detection for non-polio enteroviruses in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2016

Affiliations

Surveillance and laboratory detection for non-polio enteroviruses in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2016

Heli Harvala et al. Euro Surveill. 2017 Nov.

Abstract

Enteroviruses (EVs) cause severe outbreaks of respiratory and neurological disease as illustrated by EV-D68 and EV-A71 outbreaks, respectively. We have mapped European laboratory capacity for identification and characterisation of non-polio EVs to improve preparedness to respond to (re)-emerging EVs linked to severe disease. An online questionnaire on non-polio EV surveillance and laboratory detection was submitted to all 30 European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) countries. Twenty-nine countries responded; 26 conducted laboratory-based non-polio EV surveillance, and 24 included neurological infections in their surveillance. Eleven countries have established specific surveillance for EV-D68 via sentinel influenza surveillance (n = 7), typing EV-positive respiratory samples (n = 10) and/or acute flaccid paralysis surveillance (n = 5). Of 26 countries performing non-polio EV characterisation/typing, 10 further characterised culture-positive EV isolates, whereas the remainder typed PCR-positive but culture-negative samples. Although 19 countries have introduced sequence-based EV typing, seven still rely entirely on virus isolation. Based on 2015 data, six countries typed over 300 specimens mostly by sequencing, whereas 11 countries characterised under 50 EV-positive samples. EV surveillance activity varied between EU/EEA countries, and did not always specifically target patients with neurological and/or respiratory infections. Introduction of sequence-based typing methods is needed throughout the EU/EEA to enhance laboratory capacity for the detection of EVs.

Keywords: Europe; laboratory methods; laboratory surveillance; molecular typing; respiratory infections; viral encephalitis; viral infections; viral meningitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: All authors declare no competing interest. The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry or elsewhere to conduct this study. No ethical committee approval was required as no patient related material was collected.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Non-polio enterovirus surveillance systems currently in use in the European Union/European Economic Area countries for enteroviruses, 2016 (n=29 countries)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Specific reporting and surveillance systems in use for enterovirus-D68 in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2016 (n=29 countries)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Specific reporting and surveillance systems in use for hand, foot and mouth disease in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2016 (n=29 countries)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of non-polio enterovirus-positive samples typed in European Union/European Economic Area, 2015 (n=29 countries)
Figure 5
Figure 5
RT-PCR used for primary enterovirus detection in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2016 (n = 29 countries)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Use of commercial methods in enterovirus diagnostics in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2016 (n = 29 countries)
Figure 7
Figure 7
Use of IgG and/or IgM serology in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2016 (n = 29 countries)
Figure 8
Figure 8
Methods used for enterovirus typing/characterisation in the European Union/European Economic Area, 2016 (n = 29 countries)
Figure 9
Figure 9
Comparison of primer and probe sequences used in non-polio enterovirus detection RT-PCRs to consensus sequences in various European Union/European Economic Area, 2016 (n=11 countries)

Similar articles

  • Recommendations for enterovirus diagnostics and characterisation within and beyond Europe.
    Harvala H, Broberg E, Benschop K, Berginc N, Ladhani S, Susi P, Christiansen C, McKenna J, Allen D, Makiello P, McAllister G, Carmen M, Zakikhany K, Dyrdak R, Nielsen X, Madsen T, Paul J, Moore C, von Eije K, Piralla A, Carlier M, Vanoverschelde L, Poelman R, Anton A, López-Labrador FX, Pellegrinelli L, Keeren K, Maier M, Cassidy H, Derdas S, Savolainen-Kopra C, Diedrich S, Nordbø S, Buesa J, Bailly JL, Baldanti F, MacAdam A, Mirand A, Dudman S, Schuffenecker I, Kadambari S, Neyts J, Griffiths MJ, Richter J, Margaretto C, Govind S, Morley U, Adams O, Krokstad S, Dean J, Pons-Salort M, Prochazka B, Cabrerizo M, Majumdar M, Nebbia G, Wiewel M, Cottrell S, Coyle P, Martin J, Moore C, Midgley S, Horby P, Wolthers K, Simmonds P, Niesters H, Fischer TK. Harvala H, et al. J Clin Virol. 2018 Apr;101:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 6. J Clin Virol. 2018. PMID: 29414181 Review.
  • Circulation of non-polio enteroviruses in 24 EU and EEA countries between 2015 and 2017: a retrospective surveillance study.
    Bubba L, Broberg EK, Jasir A, Simmonds P, Harvala H; Enterovirus study collaborators. Bubba L, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;20(3):350-361. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30566-3. Epub 2019 Dec 20. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 31870905
  • Enterovirus D68 detection in respiratory specimens: Association with severe disease.
    Engelmann I, Fatoux M, Lazrek M, Alidjinou EK, Mirand A, Henquell C, Dewilde A, Hober D. Engelmann I, et al. J Med Virol. 2017 Jul;89(7):1201-1207. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24772. Epub 2017 Mar 28. J Med Virol. 2017. PMID: 28165146 Free PMC article.
  • Systematic community- and hospital-based surveillance for enterovirus-D68 in three Canadian provinces, August to December 2014.
    Skowronski DM, Chambers C, Sabaiduc S, Murti M, Gustafson R, Pollock S, Hoyano D, Rempel S, Allison S, De Serres G, Dickinson JA, Tellier R, Fonseca K, Drews SJ, Martineau C, Reyes-Domingo F, Wong T, Tang P, Krajden M. Skowronski DM, et al. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(43). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.43.30047. Euro Surveill. 2015. PMID: 26804195
  • The Emergence of Enterovirus-D68.
    Messacar K, Abzug MJ, Dominguez SR. Messacar K, et al. Microbiol Spectr. 2016 Jun;4(3). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.EI10-0018-2016. Microbiol Spectr. 2016. PMID: 27337448 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. The Pirbright Institute. The Picornavirus Pages. Surrey: The Pirbright Institute; 7 Jun 2016. [Accessed 20 Jun 2016]. Available from: http://www.picornaviridae.com
    1. Hyypiä T, Hovi T, Knowles NJ, Stanway G. Classification of enteroviruses based on molecular and biological properties. J Gen Virol. 1997;78(Pt 1):1-11. 10.1099/0022-1317-78-1-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knowles NJ, Hovi T, Hyypiä T, King AMQ, Lindberg AM, Pallansch MA, et al. Picornaviridae. In: King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ, editors. Virus Taxonomy: Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses, Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego: Elsevier; 2012 p. 855-880.
    1. Minor P, Brown F, Domingo E, Hoey E, King A, Knowles N, et al. Picornaviridae. In: Murphy FA, Fauquet CM, Bishop DHL, Ghabrial SA, Jarvis A, Martelli GP, et al., editors. Virus Taxonomy: Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses, Sixth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Vienna: Springer-Verlag; 1995. p. 329-336.
    1. Grist NR, Bell EJ, Assaad F. Enteroviruses in human disease. Prog Med Virol. 1978;24:114-57. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources