Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 20;7(11):e016232.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016232.

Relationship between socioeconomic status and HIV infection: findings from a survey in the Free State and Western Cape Provinces of South Africa

Affiliations

Relationship between socioeconomic status and HIV infection: findings from a survey in the Free State and Western Cape Provinces of South Africa

Erick Wekesa Bunyasi et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown a mixed association between socioeconomic status (SES) and prevalent HIV infection across and within settings in sub-Saharan Africa. In general, the relationship between years of formal education and HIV infection changed from a positive to a negative association with maturity of the HIV epidemic. Our objective was to determine the association between SES and HIV in women of reproductive age in the Free State (FSP) and Western Cape Provinces (WCP) of South Africa (SA).

Study design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: SA.

Methods: We conducted secondary analysis on 1906 women of reproductive age from a 2007 to 2008 survey that evaluated effectiveness of Prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission Programmes. SES was measured by household wealth quintiles, years of formal education and employment status. Our analysis principally used logistic regression for survey data.

Results: There was a significant negative trend between prevalent HIV infection and wealth quintile in WCP (P<0.001) and FSP (P=0.025). In adjusted analysis, every additional year of formal education was associated with a 10% (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.90 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.96)) significant reduction in risk of prevalent HIV infection in WCP but no significant association was observed in FSP (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.11). There was no significant association between employment and prevalent HIV in each province: (aOR 1.54; 95% CI 0.84 to 2.84) in WCP and (aOR 0.96; 95% CI 0.71 to 1.30) in FSP.

Conclusion: The association between HIV infection and SES differed by province and by measure of SES and underscores the disproportionately higher burden of prevalent HIV infection among poorer and lowly educated women. Our findings suggest the need for re-evaluation of whether current HIV prevention efforts meet needs of the least educated (in WCP) and the poorest women (both WCP and FSP), and point to the need to investigate additional or tailored strategies for these women.

Keywords: education; hiv or aids; socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HIV prevalence by age. Data were derived from the Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission of HIV, Effectiveness in Africa and, Research and Linkages to HIV Care survey (PEARL study). There were only three study participants aged 45–49 years and one aged ≥50 years.
Figure 2
Figure 2
HIV prevalence by household wealth quintiles. Data were derived from the Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission of HIV, Effectiveness in Africa and, Research and Linkages to HIV Care survey (PEARL study). FSP, study participants from the Free State Province; WCP, study participants from the Western Cape Province. Both=data for both WCP and FSP. Household wealth quintiles were generated separately for each province using data for the specified province only. The wider CI for WCP than FSP is due to clustering, as described in text. Furthermore, note that WCP had larger probability weights, used in weighting of the survey-derived data than FSP, as described in text.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Unaids U. Fact sheet - Latest statistics on the status of the AIDS epidemic. 2016. http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet (accessed 17 May 2017).
    1. Bärnighausen T, Hosegood V, Timaeus IM, et al. . The socioeconomic determinants of HIV incidence: evidence from a longitudinal, population-based study in rural South Africa. AIDS 2007;21:S29–38. 10.1097/01.aids.0000300533.59483.95 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wojcicki JM. Socioeconomic status as a risk factor for HIV infection in women in East, Central and Southern Africa: a systematic review. J Biosoc Sci 2005;37:1–36. 10.1017/S0021932004006534 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, et al. . Socioeconomic status and health. The challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol 1994;49:15–24. 10.1037/0003-066X.49.1.15 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parkhurst JO. Understanding the correlations between wealth, poverty and human immunodeficiency virus infection in African countries. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:519–26. 10.2471/BLT.09.070185 - DOI - PMC - PubMed