Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;7(2):021101.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.021101.

Quality of antenatal care service provision in health facilities across sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from nationally representative health facility assessments

Affiliations

Quality of antenatal care service provision in health facilities across sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from nationally representative health facility assessments

Mufaro Kanyangarara et al. J Glob Health. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Utilization of antenatal care (ANC) services has increased over the past two decades. Continued gains in maternal and newborn health will require an understanding of both access and quality of ANC services. We linked health facility and household survey data to examine the quality of service provision for five ANC interventions across health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods: Using data from 20 nationally representative health facility assessments - the Service Provision Assessment (SPA) and the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA), we estimated facility level readiness to deliver five ANC interventions: tetanus toxoid vaccine for pregnant women, intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy (IPTp), syphilis detection and treatment in pregnancy, iron supplementation and hypertensive disease case management. Facility level indicators were stratified by health facility type, managing authority and location, then linked to estimates of ANC utilization in that stratum from the corresponding Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) to generate population level estimates of the 'likelihood of appropriate care'. Finally, the association between estimates of the 'likelihood of appropriate care' from the linking approach and estimates of coverage levels from the DHS were assessed.

Findings: A total of 10 534 health facilities were surveyed in the 20 health facility assessments, of which 8742 reported offering ANC services and were included in the analysis. Health facility readiness to deliver IPTp, iron supplementation, and tetanus toxoid vaccination was higher (median: 84.1%, 84.9% and 82.8% respectively) than readiness to deliver hypertensive disease case management and syphilis detection and treatment (median: 23.0% and 19.9% respectively). Coverage of at least 4 ANC visits ranged from 24.8% to 75.8%. Estimates of the likelihood of appropriate care derived from linking health facility and household survey data showed marked gaps for all interventions, particularly hypertensive disease case management and syphilis detection and treatment. There was fairly good concordance between our estimates of high likelihood of appropriate care and DHS estimates of coverage for iron supplementation, IPTp, and tetanus toxoid vaccination.

Conclusion: Linking household surveys to health facility assessments revealed marked gaps in population-level coverage of quality ANC interventions and underscored the need for a double-pronged approach to increase ANC utilization and improve the quality of ANC services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare no conflicts of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Three–step process to link health facility data (SPA and SARA) to household survey data (DHS).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographic distribution of Service Provision Assessment (SPA) and Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) surveys.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Likelihood of appropriate care (LAC) for antenatal care interventions by country and year.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Results of sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of misclassification of stratum on the likelihood of appropriate care (high and moderate).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of estimated coverage (DHS) and estimated high likelihood of appropriate care (LAC) based on the ecological linking for iron supplementation, tetanus toxoid vaccination and intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA, Cousens S, Adam T, Walker N, de Bernis L, et al. Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: how many newborn babies can we save? Lancet. 2005;365:977–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71088-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonagh M. Is antenatal care effective in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality? Health Policy Plan. 1996;11:1–15. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.1.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Indicators for monitoring the Millennium Development Goals: definitions, rationale, concepts and sources. United Nations Publications; Available:http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mi/wiki/MainPage.ashx. Accessed 10 September 2016.
    1. Saad-Haddad G, Dejong J, Clara M, Méndez R, Vaz L, Amouzou A, et al. Patterns and determinants of antenatal care utilization: analysis of national survey data in seven countdown countries. J Glob Health. 2016;6:010404. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.010404. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Victora CG, Requejo JH, Barros AJD, Berman P, Bhutta Z, Boerma T, et al. Countdown to 2015: a decade of tracking progress for maternal, newborn, and child survival. Lancet. 2016;387:2049–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00519-X. - DOI - PMC - PubMed