Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 29164021
- PMCID: PMC5684847
- DOI: 10.1177/2192568217703665
Efficacy, Safety, and Timing of Anticoagulant Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Study design: Systematic review.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to answer 5 key questions: What is the comparative effectiveness and safety of (1a) anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis compared to no prophylaxis, placebo, or another anticoagulant strategy for preventing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after acute spinal cord injury (SCI)? (1b) Mechanical prophylaxis strategies alone or in combination with other strategies for preventing DVT and PE after acute SCI? (1c) Prophylactic inferior vena cava filter insertion alone or in combination with other strategies for preventing DVT and PE after acute SCI? (2) What is the optimal timing to initiate and/or discontinue anticoagulant, mechanical, and/or prophylactic inferior vena cava filter following acute SCI? (3) What is the cost-effectiveness of these treatment options?
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies published through February 28, 2015. We sought randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety of antithrombotic strategies. Strength of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
Results: Nine studies satisfied inclusion criteria. We found a trend toward lower risk of DVT in patients treated with enoxaparin. There were no significant differences in rates of DVT, PE, bleeding, and mortality between patients treated with different types of low-molecular-weight heparin or between low-molecular-weight heparin and unfractionated heparin. Combined anticoagulant and mechanical prophylaxis initiated within 72 hours of SCI resulted in lower risk of DVT than treatment commenced after 72 hours of injury.
Conclusion: Prophylactic treatments can be used to lower the risk of venous thromboembolic events in patients with acute SCI, without significant increase in risk of bleeding and mortality and should be initiated within 72 hours.
Keywords: bleeding; deep vein thrombosis; mortality; pulmonary embolism; spinal cord injury.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Routine prophylactic vena cava filtration is not indicated after acute spinal cord injury.J Trauma. 2002 May;52(5):902-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200205000-00013. J Trauma. 2002. PMID: 11988656
-
Safety and comparative efficacy of initiating low-molecular-weight heparin within 24 hours of injury or surgery for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with spinal cord injury: a prospective TRACK-SCI registry study.Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Oct;55(4):E17. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.FOCUS23362. Neurosurg Focus. 2023. PMID: 37778033
-
Operative spinal trauma: Thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin or a direct oral anticoagulant.J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Jun;17(6):925-933. doi: 10.1111/jth.14439. Epub 2019 Apr 13. J Thromb Haemost. 2019. PMID: 30924300
-
Towards evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic reviews of mechanical methods, oral anticoagulation, dextran and regional anaesthesia as thromboprophylaxis.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Dec;9(49):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-78. doi: 10.3310/hta9490. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 16336844 Review.
-
[Prevention of venous thromboembolism in polytraumatized patients. Epidemiology and importance].Presse Med. 2000 Jan 22;29(2):68-75. Presse Med. 2000. PMID: 10682030 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Can generative artificial intelligence provide accurate medical advice?: a case of ChatGPT versus Congress of Neurological Surgeons management of acute cervical spine and spinal cord injuries clinical guidelines.Asian Spine J. 2025 Jun;19(3):432-443. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0301. Epub 2025 Mar 4. Asian Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40033723 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Affecting the Decision to Initiate Anticoagulation After Spine Surgery: Findings From the AOSpine Anticoagulation Global Initiative.Global Spine J. 2022 May;12(4):548-558. doi: 10.1177/2192568220948027. Epub 2020 Sep 10. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 32911980 Free PMC article.
-
Venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation in spinal cord lesion rehabilitation inpatients: A 10-year retrospective study.NeuroRehabilitation. 2023;53(1):143-153. doi: 10.3233/NRE-230063. NeuroRehabilitation. 2023. PMID: 37424485 Free PMC article.
-
Perioperative Anticoagulation Management in Spine Surgery: Initial Findings From the AO Spine Anticoagulation Global Survey.Global Spine J. 2020 Aug;10(5):512-527. doi: 10.1177/2192568219897598. Epub 2020 Apr 17. Global Spine J. 2020. PMID: 32677576 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention of thromboembolism in spinal cord injury -S1 guideline.Neurol Res Pract. 2020 Dec 10;2:43. doi: 10.1186/s42466-020-00089-7. eCollection 2020. Neurol Res Pract. 2020. PMID: 33324943 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Miranda AR, Hassouna HI. Mechanisms of thrombosis in spinal cord injury. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000;14:401–416. - PubMed
-
- Cheng JS, Arnold PM, Anderson PA, Fischer D, Dettori JR. Anticoagulation risk in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(9 suppl):S117–S124. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d833d4. - PubMed
-
- Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Kopjar B, et al. Efficacy and safety of surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: results of the AOSpine North America prospective multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1651–1658. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00589. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
