Change in Functional Impairment, Disability, and Quality of Life Following Operative Treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 29164033
- PMCID: PMC5684851
- DOI: 10.1177/2192568217710137
Change in Functional Impairment, Disability, and Quality of Life Following Operative Treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Study design: Systematic review.
Objectives: The primary objective of this systematic review was to define the change in impairment, disability, and pain following surgical intervention in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Secondary objectives included to assess the impact of preoperative disease severity and duration of symptoms on outcomes and to summarize complications associated with surgery.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify prospective studies evaluating the effectiveness and safety of operative treatment in patients with DCM. Outcomes of interest were functional status, disability, pain, and complications. The quality of each study was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the strength of the overall body of evidence was rated using guidelines outlined by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group.
Results: Of the 385 retrieved citations, 32 met inclusion criteria and are summarized in this review. Based on our results, pooled standard mean differences showed a large effect for improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association or modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score from baseline at short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up: 6 to 12 months (1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41 to 2.43), 13 to 36 months (1.40; 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.67), and ≥36 months (1.92; 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.69) (moderate evidence). Surgery also resulted in significant improvements in Nurick, Neck Disability Index, and Visual Analogue Scale scores (low to very low evidence). The cumulative incidence of complications was low (14.1%; 95% CI = 10.1% to 18.2%).
Conclusion: Surgical intervention for DCM results in significant improvements in functional impairment, disability, and pain and is associated with an acceptably low rate of complications.
Keywords: complications; degenerative cervical myelopathy; outcomes; severity; surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Change in Function, Pain, and Quality of Life Following Structured Nonoperative Treatment in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review.Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):42S-52S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217700397. Epub 2017 Sep 5. Global Spine J. 2017. PMID: 29164032 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial discs for lumbar and cervical degenerative disc disease -update: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(10):1-98. Epub 2006 Apr 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006. PMID: 23074480 Free PMC article.
-
Laminectomy and fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from the AOSpine North America and International prospective multicenter studies.Spine J. 2017 Jan;17(1):102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Sep 3. Spine J. 2017. PMID: 27597512
-
Efficacy and Safety of Surgery for Mild Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results of the AOSpine North America and International Prospective Multicenter Studies.Neurosurgery. 2019 Apr 1;84(4):890-897. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy133. Neurosurgery. 2019. PMID: 29684181 Free PMC article.
-
Ancillary outcome measures for assessment of individuals with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S111-22. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f499. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23963009 Review.
Cited by
-
Added value of 3D fast-field-echo (FRACTURE) sequences for cervical spondylosis diagnosis: a prospective multi-reader non-inferiority study.Insights Imaging. 2025 Jun 3;16(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01997-5. Insights Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40459683 Free PMC article.
-
Presentation and management of a patient with rapid progression of degenerative cervical myelopathy during pregnancy: a case report.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2025 Apr;69(1):70-79. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2025. PMID: 40511281 Free PMC article.
-
Quality and Safety Improvement in Spine Surgery.Global Spine J. 2020 Jan;10(1 Suppl):17S-28S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219839699. Epub 2020 Jan 6. Global Spine J. 2020. PMID: 31934516 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative Neck Disability Severity Limits Extent of Postoperative Improvement Following Cervical Spine Procedures.Neurospine. 2021 Jun;18(2):377-388. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142084.042. Epub 2021 Jun 30. Neurospine. 2021. PMID: 34218619 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Definitions for Dysphagia and Dysphonia in Patients Treated Surgically for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.Global Spine J. 2022 Sep;12(7):1535-1545. doi: 10.1177/21925682211035714. Epub 2021 Aug 19. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 34409882 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cowan JA, Jr, Dimick JB, Wainess R, et al. Changes in the utilization of spinal fusion in the United States. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:15–20. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000219836.54861.CD. - PubMed
-
- Patil PG, Turner DA, Pietrobon R. National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990-2000. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:753–758. - PubMed
-
- Rhee JM, Shamji MF, Erwin WM, et al. Nonoperative management of cervical myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:S55–S67. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f41d. - PubMed
-
- Nouri A, Tetreault L, Singh A, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:E675–E693. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000913. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous