A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recommendations for Patients With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disease and Nonmyelopathic Patients With Evidence of Cord Compression
- PMID: 29164035
- PMCID: PMC5684840
- DOI: 10.1177/2192568217701914
A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Recommendations for Patients With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Disease and Nonmyelopathic Patients With Evidence of Cord Compression
Abstract
Study design: Guideline development.
Objectives: The objective of this study is to develop guidelines that outline how to best manage (1) patients with mild, moderate, and severe myelopathy and (2) nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of cord compression with or without clinical symptoms of radiculopathy.
Methods: Five systematic reviews of the literature were conducted to synthesize evidence on disease natural history; risk factors of disease progression; the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of nonoperative and surgical management; the impact of preoperative duration of symptoms and myelopathy severity on treatment outcomes; and the frequency, timing, and predictors of symptom development. A multidisciplinary guideline development group used this information, and their clinical expertise, to develop recommendations for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).
Results: Our recommendations were as follows: (1) "We recommend surgical intervention for patients with moderate and severe DCM." (2) "We suggest offering surgical intervention or a supervised trial of structured rehabilitation for patients with mild DCM. If initial nonoperative management is pursued, we recommend operative intervention if there is neurological deterioration and suggest operative intervention if the patient fails to improve." (3) "We suggest not offering prophylactic surgery for non-myelopathic patients with evidence of cervical cord compression without signs or symptoms of radiculopathy. We suggest that these patients be counseled as to potential risks of progression, educated about relevant signs and symptoms of myelopathy, and be followed clinically." (4) "Non-myelopathic patients with cord compression and clinical evidence of radiculopathy with or without electrophysiological confirmation are at a higher risk of developing myelopathy and should be counselled about this risk. We suggest offering either surgical intervention or nonoperative treatment consisting of close serial follow-up or a supervised trial of structured rehabilitation. In the event of myelopathic development, the patient should be managed according to the recommendations above."
Conclusions: These guidelines will promote standardization of care for patients with DCM, decrease the heterogeneity of management strategies and encourage clinicians to make evidence-informed decisions.
Keywords: cervical spondylotic myelopathy; degenerative cervical myelopathy; guidelines; spinal cord compression.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Introduction, Rationale, and Scope.Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):21S-27S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217703088. Epub 2017 Sep 5. Global Spine J. 2017. PMID: 29164027 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of symptomatic myelopathy in degenerative cervical spinal cord compression.Brain Behav. 2017 Aug 11;7(9):e00797. doi: 10.1002/brb3.797. eCollection 2017 Sep. Brain Behav. 2017. PMID: 28948090 Free PMC article.
-
Guidelines for the Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and Spinal Cord Injury: An Introduction to a Focus Issue.Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 Suppl):6S-7S. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701714. Epub 2017 Sep 5. Global Spine J. 2017. PMID: 29164034 Free PMC article.
-
What is the role of non-surgical clinicians in the assessment and management of degenerative cervical myelopathy? - Insights from the RECODE-DCM peri-operative rehabilitation incubator.Brain Spine. 2025 May 8;5:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104275. eCollection 2025. Brain Spine. 2025. PMID: 40487873 Free PMC article. Review.
-
AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations for Diagnosis and Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Evidence Based Decision Making - A Review of Cutting Edge Recent Literature Related to Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.Global Spine J. 2025 Jun;15(5):2585-2593. doi: 10.1177/21925682251331050. Epub 2025 Apr 21. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 40257837 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Benchmarking Large Language Models for Cervical Spondylosis.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Aug 5;8:e55577. doi: 10.2196/55577. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39102674 Free PMC article.
-
Varied presentations of cervical spondylotic myelopathy presenting to a chiropractic clinic: a report of 3 cases.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022 Aug;66(2):146-156. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022. PMID: 36275077 Free PMC article.
-
Most degenerative cervical myelopathy remains undiagnosed, particularly amongst the elderly: modelling the prevalence of degenerative cervical myelopathy in the United Kingdom.J Neurol. 2023 Jan;270(1):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11349-8. Epub 2022 Sep 2. J Neurol. 2023. PMID: 36056204 Free PMC article.
-
A matched case-control study of early cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on diffusion magnetic resonance imaging.Insights Imaging. 2024 Jan 25;15(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01579-3. Insights Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38270768 Free PMC article.
-
Flipping the mJOA: Clinical utility of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score as a tool for detecting degenerative cervical myelopathy.Brain Spine. 2024 Jun 26;4:102853. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102853. eCollection 2024. Brain Spine. 2024. PMID: 39040488 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Wilson JR, Skelly AC. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: current state of the art and future directions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(22 suppl):S1–S8. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7e9e0. - PubMed
-
- Fehlings MG, Tetreault L, Nater A, et al. The aging of the global population: the changing epidemiology of disease and spinal disorders. Neurosurgery. 2015;77(suppl 4):S1–S5 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000953. - PubMed
-
- Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Nouri A, et al. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:78–84. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4660-8. - PubMed
-
- Shiffman RN, Michel G. Toward improved guideline quality: using the COGS statement with GEM. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107:159–163. - PubMed
-
- Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, Slutsky J, Grimshaw J, Deshpande AM. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:493–498. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical