Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr;153(4):415-422.
doi: 10.1111/imm.12870. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

Immune correlates of clinical outcome in melanoma

Affiliations
Review

Immune correlates of clinical outcome in melanoma

Graham Pawelec. Immunology. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Melanoma has long been recognized as a potentially immunogenic tumour, but only recently has it become clear that the reason for this resides in its many ultraviolet (UV)-induced mutations and expression of multiple autoantigens which can be targeted by the immune system. The first successful applications of immune-based treatments included passive immunotherapy using high-dose interleukin (IL)-2 and/or adoptive transfer of natural killer (NK)-cells, as well as active immunotherapy using whole cell-derived or peptide vaccines. In the intervening decades, it has become clear that these approaches can lead to durable responses in stage III/IV melanoma, and even to functional cures - but only in a vanishingly small fraction of patients. With the advent of immune checkpoint blockade first with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte 4 (CTLA-4), then with anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, and combinations thereof, the small percentage of responding patients may be increased to half, a major accomplishment in this refractory disease. Improved techniques for identifying mutation-derived neoantigens and thus more sophisticated active immunotherapies, probably combined with checkpoint blockade, currently hold great promise for further increasing the fraction of responding patients. As additional immunomodulatory antibodies and therapies become available, it will be increasingly important to develop diagnostic tools to determine which particular therapy is likely to elicit the best response for the individual patient. Practically speaking, therapy selection and efficacy monitoring on the basis of the results of a blood test would be most desirable. The purpose of this review is to consider the feasibility of identifying 'immune signatures' for predicting responses and determining mechanisms responsible for success or failure of these immunotherapies.

Keywords: cancer; checkpoint blockade; immunotherapy; melanoma; tumour immunology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential targets for immunomodulatory antibody therapy in cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Burnet FM. Immunological surveillance in neoplasia. Transplant Rev 1971; 7:3–25. - PubMed
    1. Perez EA. Current management of metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 1999; 26(4 Suppl 12):1–10. - PubMed
    1. Fanger MW, Morganelli PM, Guyre PM. Bispecific antibodies. Crit Rev Immunol 1992; 12:101–24. - PubMed
    1. Hegde UP, Mukherji B. Current status of chimeric antigen receptor engineered T cell‐based and immune checkpoint blockade‐based cancer immunotherapies. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2017; 66:1113–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-017-2007-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg SA. The development of new immunotherapies for the treatment of cancer using interleukin‐2. A review. Ann Surg 1988; 208:121–35. - PMC - PubMed

Substances