Caesarean birth rates in public and privately funded hospitals: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 29166449
- PMCID: PMC5697922
- DOI: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051007054
Caesarean birth rates in public and privately funded hospitals: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objective: To examine maternal and obstetric factors influencing births by cesarean section according to health care funding.
Methods: A cross-sectional study with data from Southeastern Brazil. Caesarean section births from February 2011 to July 2012 were included. Data were obtained from interviews with women whose care was publicly or privately funded, and from their obstetric and neonatal records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to generate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for caesarean section births.
Results: The overall caesarean section rate was 53% among 9,828 women for whom data were available, with the highest rates among women whose maternity care was privately funded. Reasons for performing a c-section were infrequently documented in women's maternity records. The variables that increased the likelihood of c-section regardless of health care funding were the following: paid employment, previous c-section, primiparity, antenatal and labor complications. Older maternal age, university education, and higher socioeconomic status were only associated with c-section in the public system.
Conclusions: Higher maternal socioeconomic status was associated with greater likelihood of a caesarean section birth in publicly funded settings, but not in the private sector, where funding source alone determined the mode of birth rather than maternal or obstetric characteristics. Maternal socioeconomic status and private healthcare funding continue to drive high rates of caesarean section births in Brazil, with women who have a higher socioeconomic status more likely to have a caesarean section birth in all birth settings.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- World Health Organization. Department of Reproductive Health and Research . WHO statement on caesareans rates. Geneva: WHO; 2015. [cited 2017 Jul 13]. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/161442/1/WHO_RHR_15.02_eng.pdf.
-
- Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world. 331Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4) e1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.026. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Raifman S, Cunha AJ, Castro MC. Factors associated with high rates of caesarean section in Brazil between 1991 and 2006. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(7):e295–e299. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12620. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Leal MC, Pereira APE, Domingues RMSM, Theme MM, Filha, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M, et al. Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(Suppl 1):S17–S32. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00151513. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, d’Orsi E, Pereira APE, et al. Process of decision-making regarding the mode of birth in Brazil: from the initial preference of women to the final mode of birth. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(Suppl 1):S101–S116. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00105113. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical