How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey
- PMID: 29168409
- PMCID: PMC5795744
- DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018
How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey
Abstract
Background: In 2014, the 'Smarter Medicine' campaign released a top five list of unnecessary tests and treatments in Swiss primary care, such as imaging for acute low-back pain and long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors.
Objectives: Measure general practitioners' (GPs) agreement with the recommendations and self-reported adherence.
Methods: Cross-sectional, online survey of GPs in the 'Swiss primary care active monitoring' (SPAM) network, which assessed awareness of 'Smarter Medicine' and views on each recommendation. Questions included whether the clinical situation is common, whether the recommendation is followed, whether GPs agree with the recommendation and reasons why the recommendation would not be followed.
Results: One-hundred-and-sixty-seven of 277 GPs from the SPAM network participated (60%), of which 104 (62%) knew of 'Smarter Medicine', including 79% in German areas, 49% in French areas and 38% in Italian areas (P < 0.001). Agreement with the five recommendations was high, with scores around nine out of 10. The proportion saying they typically follow each recommendation was 68 to 74%, except not continuing long-term PPI prescriptions without attempting dose reduction, with only 34%. Common reasons for not following the recommendations were patient or other provider requests and situations that might suggest the need for more aggressive care.
Conclusion: Two years after the launch of the campaign, awareness and acceptance of 'Smarter Medicine' appear to be high among Swiss GPs. By self-report, the recommendations are adhered to by most of the respondents but there may be room for improvement, especially for long-term PPI prescriptions.
Keywords: Clinical decision-making; general practice; medical overuse; proton pump inhibitors; rational use of medications.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Similar articles
-
Why do GPs continue inappropriate hospital prescriptions of proton pump inhibitors? A qualitative study.Eur J Gen Pract. 2014 Sep;20(3):174-80. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2013.844787. Epub 2013 Nov 13. Eur J Gen Pract. 2014. PMID: 24219345
-
Sickness certification in primary care: a survey on views and practices among Swiss physicians.Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 Nov 20;145:w14201. doi: 10.4414/smw.2015.14201. eCollection 2015. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015. PMID: 26588114
-
[The general practitioner's knowledge and attitude towards proton pump inhibitors adverse effects].Therapie. 2020 May-Jun;75(3):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Aug 1. Therapie. 2020. PMID: 31471066 French.
-
Adherence to guidelines when evaluating fitness-to-drive in the elderly: a practice review of Swiss physicians.Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jul 9;148:w14632. doi: 10.57187/smw.2018.14632. eCollection 2018. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018. PMID: 30044469 Review.
-
[Assessment of the French Consensus Conference for Acute Viral Bronchiolitis on outpatient management: progress between 2003 and 2008].Arch Pediatr. 2010 Feb;17(2):125-31. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2009.10.022. Epub 2009 Dec 2. Arch Pediatr. 2010. PMID: 19959347 French.
Cited by
-
Drivers and strategies for avoiding overuse. A cross-sectional study to explore the experience of Spanish primary care providers handling uncertainty and patients' requests.BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 15;8(6):e021339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021339. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29909371 Free PMC article.
-
Organizational influences on the use of low-value care in primary health care - a qualitative interview study with physicians in Sweden.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Dec;40(4):426-437. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2139467. Epub 2022 Nov 3. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022. PMID: 36325746 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants for the use and de-implementation of low-value care in health care: a scoping review.Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Feb 4;2(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00110-3. Implement Sci Commun. 2021. PMID: 33541443 Free PMC article.
-
Primary prevention of sexually transmitted infections in Switzerland: practices of family physicians and their determinants-a national cross-sectional survey.BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 2;10(9):e032950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032950. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32878749 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP's perspective-a cross-sectional survey.BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 3;10(6):e037019. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037019. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32499273 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation Choosing wisely; 2013. [cited 2017 Sept 14]. Available from: http://www.choosingwisely.org/
-
- Levinson W, Kallewaard M, Bhatia RS, et al. . ‘Choosing Wisely’: a growing international campaign. Bmj Qual Saf. 2015;24:167–174. - PubMed
-
- OECD/WHO OECD Reviews of Health Systems: Switzerland 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2011.
-
- Académie Suisse des Sciences Médicales Médecine Durable: Feuille de Route. Basel; 2012.
-
- Selby K, Gaspoz JM, Rodondi N, et al. . Creating a list of low-value health care activities in Swiss primary care. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:640–642. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources