Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul;146(1):23-33.
doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_679_15.

Newer direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infection: Perspectives for India

Affiliations
Review

Newer direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infection: Perspectives for India

Varun Gupta et al. Indian J Med Res. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Approximately three per cent of the world's population (170-200 million people) is chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and almost 500,000 people die each year (mostly in lower middle-income countries) from complications secondary to HCV infection. In India, HCV infection imposes a considerable burden of mortality, morbidity and healthcare costs. In the last two decades, the treatment of HCV has evolved from interferon (IFN)-based therapies with or without ribavirin (RBV) to pegylated-IFN (PEG-IFN) and RBV-based therapies that were better tolerated by patients. However, the introduction of oral drugs, which specifically target virus-specific proteins, has now revolutionized the treatment of chronic HCV. These agents are known as direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). These drugs have resulted in very high HCV cure rates even with reduced treatment duration and an excellent tolerability by the patients compared to PEG-IFN- and RBV-based therapies. In India, sofosbuvir (SOF), one of the most effective DAAs, has been made available at a compassionate price; thus only those DAA-based management strategies, which contain SOF are adopted in India. Here, we review different DAAs and their possible roles in different genotypes and stages of liver disease, stressing upon the role of SOF. An attempt has also been made to devise strategies using SOF for the most prevalent genotypes in our country (genotypes 3 and 1) and cirrhosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Sustained viral response (SVR) rates with various regimens in genotypes 1 and 3. PEG, Peg-interferon; RBV, Ribavirin; SIM, Simeprevir; SOF, Sofosbuvir; OMB, Ombitasvir; PARIT, Paritaprevir; RITONA, Ritonavir; DASA, Dasabuvir; DACLAT, Daclatasvir; LEDI, Ledipasvir.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lutchman G, Kim WR. A glass half full: Implications of screening for hepatitis C virus in the era of highly effective antiviral therapy. Hepatology. 2015;61:1455–8. - PubMed
    1. European Association for Study of Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2014;60:392–420. - PubMed
    1. AASLD/IDSA HCV Guidance Panel. Hepatitis C guidance: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating adults infected with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 2015;62:932–54. - PubMed
    1. Puri P, Anand AC, Saraswat VA, Acharya SK, Dhiman RK, Sarin SK, et al. Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) guidance for antiviral therapy against HCV infection in 2015. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015;5:221–38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lavanchy D. The global burden of hepatitis C. Liver Int. 2009;29(Suppl 1):74–81. - PubMed

MeSH terms