Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Nov 23;18(1):334.
doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0751-y.

How does pre-dialysis education need to change? Findings from a qualitative study with staff and patients

Gill Combes  1 , Kim Sein  2 , Kerry Allen  3
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

How does pre-dialysis education need to change? Findings from a qualitative study with staff and patients

Gill Combes et al. BMC Nephrol. .

Abstract

Background: Pre-dialysis education (PDE) is provided to thousands of patients every year, helping them decide which renal replacement therapy (RRT) to choose. However, its effectiveness is largely unknown, with relatively little previous research into patients' views about PDE, and no research into staff views. This study reports findings relevant to PDE from a larger mixed methods study, providing insights into what staff and patients think needs to improve.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews in four hospitals with 96 clinical and managerial staff and 93 dialysis patients, exploring experiences of and views about PDE, and analysed using thematic framework analysis.

Results: Most patients found PDE helpful and staff valued its role in supporting patient decision-making. However, patients wanted to see teaching methods and materials improve and biases eliminated. Staff were less aware than patients of how informal staff-patient conversations can influence patients' treatment decision-making. Many staff felt ill equipped to talk about all treatment options in a balanced and unbiased way. Patient decision-making was found to be complex and patients' abilities to make treatment decisions were adversely affected in the pre-dialysis period by emotional distress.

Conclusions: Suggested improvements to teaching methods and educational materials are in line with previous studies and current clinical guidelines. All staff, irrespective of their role, need to be trained about all treatment options so that informal conversations with patients are not biased. The study argues for a more individualised approach to PDE which is more like counselling than education and would demand a higher level of skill and training for specialist PDE staff. The study concludes that even if these improvements are made to PDE, not all patients will benefit, because some find decision-making in the pre-dialysis period too complex or are unable to engage with education due to illness or emotional distress. It is therefore recommended that pre-dialysis treatment decisions are temporary, and that PDE is replaced with on-going RRT education which provides opportunities for personalised education and on-going review of patients' treatment choices. Emotional support to help overcome the distress of the transition to end-stage renal disease will also be essential to ensure all patients can benefit from RRT education.

Keywords: Counselling; Emotional support; Patient choice; Patient decision-making; Pre-dialysis education; Renal replacement therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was provided by the University of Birmingham Research Ethics Committee in July 2011 (ERN 11–04790).

Consent for publication

All interviewees and observed individuals provided written consent to take part, which included consent for publication, including anonymised quotations.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. UK Renal Registry. The Seventeenth Annual Report. 2014. UK renal registry, Bristol.
    1. Covic A, Bammens B, Lobbedez T, Segall L, Heimburger O, van Biesen W, Foque D and Vanholder R. Educating end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis modality selection: a clinical advice from the European Renal Best practice (ERBP) Advisory Board NDT Plus 2010;3:225–233. doi:10.1093/ndtplus/sfq059. - PubMed
    1. Mehotra R, March D, Vonesh E, Peters V, Nissenson A. Patient education and access of ESRD patients to renal replacement therapies beyond in-centre haemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2005;68:378–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00453.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Biesen W, van der Veer S, Murphey M, Loblova O, Davies S. Patients’ perceptions of information and education for renal replacement therapy: an independent survey by the European Kidney Patients; Federation on information and support on renal replacement therapy. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(7):e103914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103914. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morton R, Howard K, Webster A, Snelling P. Patient information about options for treatment (PINOT): a prospective national study of information given to incident CKD stage 5 patients. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2011;26:1266–1274. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq555. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types