Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Nov 23;18(1):559.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2289-5.

Network methods to support user involvement in qualitative data analyses: an introduction to Participatory Theme Elicitation

Paul Best  1   2 , Jennifer Badham  3   4 , Rekesh Corepal  3   4 , Roisin F O'Neill  3   4 , Mark A Tully  3   4 , Frank Kee  3   4 , Ruth F Hunter  3   4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Network methods to support user involvement in qualitative data analyses: an introduction to Participatory Theme Elicitation

Paul Best et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: While Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) is encouraged throughout the research process, engagement is typically limited to intervention design and post-analysis stages. There are few approaches to participatory data analyses within complex health interventions.

Methods: Using qualitative data from a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), this proof-of-concept study tests the value of a new approach to participatory data analysis called Participatory Theme Elicitation (PTE). Forty excerpts were given to eight members of a youth advisory PPI panel to sort into piles based on their perception of related thematic content. Using algorithms to detect communities in networks, excerpts were then assigned to a thematic cluster that combined the panel members' perspectives. Network analysis techniques were also used to identify key excerpts in each grouping that were then further explored qualitatively.

Results: While PTE analysis was, for the most part, consistent with the researcher-led analysis, young people also identified new emerging thematic content.

Conclusions: PTE appears promising for encouraging user led identification of themes arising from qualitative data collected during complex interventions. Further work is required to validate and extend this method.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02455986 . Retrospectively Registered on 21 May 2015.

Keywords: Network analysis; Participatory analysis; Patient and public involvement; Trials; User involvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was granted ethical approval by the School of Medicine, Dentistry and Bio-medical Sciences Research Ethic Committee, Queen’s University, Belfast (REF: 15.09v3).

Consent for publication

All personal data has been anonymised, Consent for publication was gained via project Information Sheets made available as part of the study

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preparation of focus group data. *Each box labelled 1–8 represents an individual youth advisory panel (YAP) member
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sorting example
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Constructing the network for grouping
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Network diagram of sorting results. Each circle represents a quote and a line between them indicates that at least one youth advisory panel (YAP) member placed the two excerpts into the same pile, with a thicker line where more YAP members did so. Circles with the same colours indicate that the relevant excerpts were assigned to the same theme, with three excerpts (ID1, ID19 and ID36) not belonging to any theme
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hayes H, Buckland S, Tarpey M. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: Involve; 2012.
    1. Richards T, Snow R, Schroter S. Logging The BMJ’s ‘patient journey’. BMJ. 2015;351:h4396. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4396. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McLaughlin H. Involving young service users as co-researchers: possibilities, benefits and costs. Br J Soc Work. 2006;36:1395–410. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch420. - DOI
    1. Kellett M. Rethinking children and research: attitudes in contemporary society. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group; 2010.
    1. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, Suleman R. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014;7:387–95. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data